User talk:Ancient sunburst

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Richard Relucio (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

- Peripitus (Talk) 20:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancient sunburst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do I get tagged as a socketpuppet? Did I do something wrong? I noticed in the history that people who are associated with PLM or edited at the PLM articles get discriminated and tagged as a socketpuppet. Why is this? Is this a railroading act of prejudice? Now, how can be this encyclopedia free for anyone to edit? How can I prove that I am never a socketpuppet?

Decline reason:

After a review of your edit history, it is quite clear that you are, in fact, Richard Relucio, and thus this is a sock account. AKRadecki^Speaketh 02:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancient sunburst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is so insane. How can I prove you wrong? The reason I've started editing is that I feel that my contribution would be vital for the article about MY UNIVERSITY, and only those articles about my school that I want to concentrate on. How can still be part of Wikipedia when I'm being judged based on editing about PLM? I need for this to be resolved as soon as possible. I can see that some of the previous edits, although it does not do any harm to Wikipedia, still get reverted to the older edit. Please check my contribution, and validate it before reverting. How can I now add the new information that I have when the administrators would revert my edits? Is there a discrimination towards Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila or anyone associated with it here at Wikipedia? I want to write to the PLM administration so that they could help me out with this problem. How can new editors be safeguarded of their rights to edit based on Wikipedia guidelines when they are being placed under suspicion? Next week, it will be the Grand Alumni Homecoming at PLM, and being part of the PLM Family, I want to reach out to our beloved administrators here at Wikipedia to re-allow my account, User:Ancient sunburst to edit about PLM freely.

Decline reason:

Your edits substantially match those of Richard Relucio as well as every one of his other sockpuppets. Please log into your first account and request an unblock there. You may not merely create a new account to avoid a prior block. Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ancient sunburst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not possess a first account like you are trying to say; this is the only account that I have here. I don't know why do you have to block me for merely reverting the edits to the last version given by someone you have had suspected to be a sockpuppet of someone else. I checked the contribution made by the previous editors who are believed to be a "sockpuppet," and what he or she contributed is not an act of vandalism at all. Kindly check the contributions I have done so far, and it's all constructive and valid. For instance, I replaced the URL title of an article because it is not the name of the link provided there; the dead links are likewise replaced with a new, working URL; I also added the head label at the infoboxuniversity about the Executive Vice President of PLM; I corrected a sentence under History-Recent development subpage. Now, tell me these things are vandalism? They are not. And, why do you have to suspect that I'm a socketpuppet of someone else when I'm merely a person passionate of my school and not actually connected to the person blocked from this site?

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry isn't about the value of the edits; it's about creating accounts for the purpose of deceiving the community or evading blocks using multiple accounts. It's nearly impossible to prove whether or not 2 accounts are the same person - we must compare edits of different accounts and check for the likelihood that they are being used bby the same person. If account A does an edit, the edit is reverted, and then account B re-does it - this is clear evidence that A and B are the same person.

Additionally, if you are writing about "MY UNIVERSITY" and "my school" (your previous request) - you are likely to be creating problems with conflict of interests.

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]