User talk:Anchan Balti

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anchan Balti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for editing this page Drift.com. I created this page after seeing its notability. An editor put a speedy deletion tag. I contested it in a talk page. But User:Bbb23 redirected page to its founder David Cancel. I removed the redirect because contest is already started on Talk page. The editor blocked me for just this reason. Neither I did any vandalism nor anything else. As speedy deletion contest is started in Talk page therefore I removed redirect by the editor. Kindly review this block. --WikiMaster 1:10 pm, Today (UTC−8)

Decline reason:

Decline per Bbb23's reasoning. Any future unblock request should clearly identify that you understand the behavior that led to you being blocked. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user should not be unblocked. I don't think they have the slightest understanding of what they did wrong. They do not heed warnings. Some of their reverts were nonsensical, including the last, which completely blanked the page. They've removed the warnings from this page and the previous block notice. I also think their actions and comments demonstrate that they are incompetent to edit Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Hamza Shafqaat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Hamza Shafqaat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Hamza Shafqaat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 23:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]