User talk:Anbans 585/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Anbans 585. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Location map of teams
Thanks for adding the location map of teams in various competitions. Can I ask you to do a favour? Can you add the 10 teams which are transferred from the 2017 Copa Libertadores to the map of 2017 Copa Sudamericana? It is not too easy so your help will be appreciated! Chanheigeorge (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC) @Chanheigeorge: Yeah sure, you can ask for favours anytime mate.--Anbans 585 (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC) @Chanheigeorge:, shouldn't we use a map without rivers for the Copa Libertadores and Copa Sudamericana? The rivers create a lot of confusion while reading the map.--Anbans 585 (talk) 19:40, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Anbans 585:, Sure! Do you know how to make one which greys out the non-CONMEBOL parts (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Central America and Caribbean)? Thanks! Chanheigeorge (talk) 20:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Chanheigeorge:, I can create a map with the greyed out part, will that be okay ("NEW MAP")?--Anbans 585 (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for giving us AFC Cup and ACL information. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you very much...!!! @Hhhhhkohhhhh:--Anbans 585 (talk) 12:10, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hello Anbans 585. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. clpo13(talk) 00:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
AFC Futsal Championship
AFC Futsal Championship hi , thanks for your edits but china 47 match , iran 136 GA and uzbekistan 330 GF not 329. i correct them Bagsabets (talk) 10:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
@Bagsabets: thanks for helping me there.--Anbans 585 (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
A beer for you!
When my device has a problem, you corrected my edit and updated. So thank you for updating at that time Happy editing! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC) |
@Hhhhhkohhhhh: Thanks..!! Do you know how I use them(the Barnstar etc) on my User page, so that it is viewable there. Sorry, I am a bit knew to this kind of thing.--Anbans 585 (talk) 17:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- It is Wikilove (a love sign). It is at the right of View history on userpage or usertalkpage. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 17:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raphael Bocco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman: Sorry, I forgot to add even the edit summary, will do it right away!--Anbans 585 (talk) 10:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Request to help in Discussion
Please help us in this Discussion. Shahin (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
2018 AFC Women's Asian Cup squads
Please be neater with your edits! Also be mindful of standards from other pages as well the what other users have already done and not just edit to your liking which is quite messy to say the least! Thers's also no point in adding a caps/goals section for certain teams when they're not even known! FilFootyGuy (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
@FilFootyGuy: I am very sorry about the changes which I made to your edit. The reasons why i made the edit was-
- I added the caps and goals section, because there is a chance that in future (during the tournament maybe) someone may tell us about the caps and goals about the particular team.
- I changed the format so that every squad has the same formatting style, as you may have noticed, I added the remaining squads too, that is why I felt that it may be good if this squad has the same formatting style. Very sorry about that.
- I do believe that you should divide the sections in different parts, i.e. use the break statement so that if one looks at the squads, he/she may easily get to know who are the defenders, goalkeepers etc. Similar formatting style is also used for squads of other competitions. Very sorry, if you didn't like it.--Anbans 585 (talk) 19:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft of 2020 OCL, ACL and ACC
Recently, I created those drafts in User:Hhhhhkohhhhh/ACL, User:Hhhhhkohhhhh/ACC and User:Hhhhhkohhhhh/OCL. I invited you to improve those drafts, so please feel free to edit on those page, but do not move to mainspace without approval of me, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
@Hhhhhkohhhhh: Nice work..!!--Anbans 585 (talk) 11:48, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! As a new page reviewer, Do you have any suggestion or ideas or errors on these? Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Anbans 585, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
- As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
- Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
- Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
FIFA match summaries
Hi. I thank you for your contributions on the match summaries (though I think they're unnecessary). However, I ask that you remain neutral when writing them. Also, I suggest changing the language as it sounds what a sports host or writer may say when speaking about the game. This is an encyclopedia. Such things like "powerful shot" and such go against NPOV and the language doesn't reflect what Wikipedia normally uses. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Callmemirela: Thanks for the appreciation. Actually I try to be as much neutral as possible while writing these match summaries. Its not my original content as the content is mostly copied from the sources from where I am getting the match summary. Though I will try more hard to keep them more neutral. Actually, its my first time writing these kind of summaries (lack of experience), but I tried to learn from the match summaries of the previous tournaments.--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! I'll go through the current ones and change some of its language. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 20:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Callmemirela: Thanks for the help, I will look into those and make the future summaries accordingly.--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Callmemirela: Check the 2018 FIFA World Cup Group B page, and tell me if I can help in improving those summaries.--Anbans 585 (talk) 21:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Much better. Exactly what I talked about. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 23:48, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You need to fix arg vs cro match summary. Specifically, Rakitic's initial shot was deflected into the path of Kovacic who then passed it back to Rakitic. Kovacic never shot as your summary states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.49.54.162 (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
FIFA Statistical Kit
Hi Anbans
Here and here are the links to the updated info about the knockout matches. Right now I don't really have the time to do the editions myself so, by all means, go ahead with it. Also, here is where FIFA publish new documents every day about the WC, and once the QF matches are defined, they'll probably publish there the head-to-head info for those matches too.
Hope you to have a nice day! Felviper (talk) 22:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello Anbans 585, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 2018 AFC Futsal Club Championship squads
Hi, I'm Vexations. Anbans 585, thanks for creating 2018 AFC Futsal Club Championship squads!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is no lead section that briefly summarizes the article. For someone who is unfamiliar with the topic it isn't immediately clear what the article is about; an event organized by the Asian Football Confederation.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Vexations (talk) 18:17, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Re: Penalty
You are right, there seems to be error in the website. Coderzombie (talk) 12:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
@Coderzombie: can you help me in finding the referee's name? Have been unsuccessful so far.--Anbans 585 (talk) 12:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello Anbans 585, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.
- Project news
- The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
- As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
- There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.
- Other
- A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.
- Moving to Draft and Page Mover
- Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
- If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
- Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
- The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
- The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing
|
---|
|
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
about TPE vs PLE
I found some discrepancies between AFC recap and the full match video streamed and uploaded by FFKR here Let us discuss. – Flix11 (talk) 15:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Flix11: What is the final score in the video..??--Anbans 585 (talk) 15:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Anbans 585: See each goal first, especially the 52nd minute. The cut is here. As you can see the scoreboard changed even if there was no ball in the net nor celebration. – Flix11 (talk) 15:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Flix11: Ya you are right about it, but I think that there is a good chance that the goal may have been scored earlier, but the stream added the goal later. It happens a couple of times when some part of the stream is due to some power outrage etc, for example the India v Pakistan match on mycujoo shows that the final score was 2–0, but as you may know that the actual score is 4–0. Therefore I think that there is a good chance that there is a good chance that there is some problem with the stream. For now I think that we should wait for the official stats.the-afc.com report and see what scoreline they have showed in their report, or we can check some official news resources from both Chinese Taipei and Palestine and try to verify the same. Do tell me what you think about it, and we may take the action likewise.--Anbans 585 (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Question
Why do you not use small tag [1]? Hhkohh (talk) 15:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- But 2017 AFC Champions League knockout stage use small tag Hhkohh (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Hhkohh: I am very sorry about that error, actually I usually edit national team competitions from CAF, AFC and UEFA. And in all those events whenever I used the penalty template then I used to use the simple one, as all the competitions before it had the same formatting style. That is why I removed it. But it seems that in club competitions the format for styling has been done differently from past time. You can use small, no issues, I was just trying to make it similar to all the other football articles which I remember and have seen, so that a sense of uniformity can be seen in all of those articles, and in that way it may look a bit clean then before. Very sorry for the error.--Anbans 585 (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, you see 2017 CAF Champions League knockout stage, it is another bracket format Hhkohh (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
@Hhkohh: You can change the format for club competitions, but please don't make any changes to the national team competitions, because all of them including the 2018 FIFA World Cup uses different type of formatting.--Anbans 585 (talk) 17:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- okay, thanks Hhkohh (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ikouwem Udo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 07:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman: Added the citation you needed.--Anbans 585 (talk) 08:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
AFC U-16 Championship 2018
Hello there. I was thinking the same thing, but according to this link [2] and [3], AFG has been eliminated after that loss to KOR. After looking back to the article made by AFC [4], I guess you're right after all. Thanks for clarifying this matter. Aalv15 (talk) 02:56, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2018 Asian Games women's kabaddi game A3
Template:2018 Asian Games women's kabaddi game A3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
2018 Bangabandhu Cup
1. Just like the link that I provided for the 2015 edition of the tournament from the BFF website, these FA's always just simply refer to there teams as "Bangladesh" or "Philippines" or whatever other country. That's not much of a source. 2. Again, obviously FIFA is the world governing body of the sport. However, as I've already told you, they have gone against there own statutes many times! Just looking at some of the Asian friendlies over the years. So many of them have remained on FIFA's list despite the excessive subs! There have also been matches where they seem like perfectly legit internationals but have been removed from FIFA's list. 3. This is where you're very hard headed! FIFA IS NOT THE BE ALL AND END ALL OF WHAT IS AND WHAT ISN'T A FULL INTERNATIONAL MATCH. Refer to #2! They have gone against their own statutes many many times in the past! Just because a match is listed on their doesn't mean the team in question is automatically the senior national team! 4. Yet, again, this is where the likes of these small football nations fall flat. They don't really keep records and anything that they seem to publish is always usually referring to the senior team. For these federations, if the tournament in question is a senior team tournament, they would automatically refer to it as the "national team". 5. For the umpteenth time, FIFA is not the only basis in these cases because again, they have gone against their own statutes countless times before! It's not about "considering what they say". It's about actually having a brain and using it and not just being a robot and being a yes man! If there are sources which say otherwise then they need to seriously be taken into consideration to say the least! Someone from the coaching staff already said that the team wasn't the full national team and it was the reserves!! What more do you need?!?!?!?! I've also already told you about how the full national team was already in a different country since the 8th for a training camp. You can't have the full national team in two different countries at once!! If this team that competed in Bangladesh was really the full national team then most, if not all of them, should have gone to Qatar for the training camp. Instead only two of them did! To drive it home further, the Bangladesh FA president wanted all teams to be the full national teams so they registered all fixtures as 'A' internationals even before knowing what standard of team each nation would be able to send since this is just a small tournament and it is outside of the international window! There's your explanation for the matches being listed on FIF.com since you're so pro FIFA. FilFootyGuy (talk) 11:45, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
@FilFootyGuy: Question-How many subs are allowed in FIFA friendlies?--Anbans 585 (talk) 11:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
- Using WP:NOR as a basis?!?! You're a complete joke! As I've mentioned, the Daily Star Bangladesh is the source!! Someone from the Philippines' coaching staff admitted that they brought they "reserves"! What else would "reserves" mean? A reserve team means B team! Stop undoing edits on baseless grounds. I don't want to edit war and neither do I want this to drag on! It is sourced end of story! If you continue to undo edits based on your random beliefs and random basis such as WP:NOR, then you will be reported. FilFootyGuy (talk) 11:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
|
Hello Anbans 585, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Anbans 585,
- Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
- Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.
- If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.
- We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.
- With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Anbans 585. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Anbans 585. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello Anbans 585,
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
- Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.
See also the list of top 100 reviewers.
- Less good news, and an appeal for some help
The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
- Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019
At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
- Training video
Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
2019 AFC squads - Lebanon player names
Hi,
The reason why I decided to add the "second" names of certain players is that these players' common names (Omar Bugiel, Felix Michel, Alexander Michel) are their "European" names. In Arabic speaking countries, for example, Omar Bugiel is called Omar Chaaban (in TV commentaries or in newspapers), meaning that if an Arabic-speaking person were to look for "Chaaban" he wouldn't find him. That's why I decided to keep both surnames (I haven't written down "Name Middlename Surname" but "Name Firstsurname Secondsurname").
Thanks, Nehme1499 (talk) 21:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
@Nehme1499: Ooh sorry I didn’t knew about that. I guess adding Felix and Alexander’s Arab name is also their common name (I checked a source) and yes I guess we can use the middle name Chabaan for Omar as if an Arab was to read the page then he would be clueless who Bugiel is and not recoganise him. So maybe just changing Bugiel’s name to full name would be enough as the other two’s Arab name is their common name.
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello Anbans 585, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Can you help me add location to the article map? Happy new year! Hhkohh (talk) 01:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
2019 AFC Asian Cup
May I ask what month did adam tull's contract expired? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcolacson (talk • contribs) 04:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
@Marcolacson: The info is according to the AFC document, which consists of data submitted by the respective football federations and the players, I can't find a news-bit which states that he is currently associated with the club, if you have any source then we can undo the info and make changes accordingly.--Anbans 585 (talk) 07:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.17
Hello Anbans 585,
- News
- The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
- Discussions of interest
- Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
- {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
- A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
- There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
- Reminders
- NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
- NPP Tools Report
- Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
- copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
- The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Edit info
Hi, Thanks for your big edit here. Out of interest and to help me update, where did you get the info? For example, even as I write the match report for JPNvMYA doesn't have the goalscorers, and I haven't found it on Soccerway or Livescores which are my usual go-tos. I'd love to hear of more sources, which are more quickly updated even. Cheers, --SuperJew (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The stats.the-afc.com reports get updated at 18:00 GMT and 3:30 GMT. It is better to read the match reports by AFC, or the temporary reports in the fixtures section of this link. Other than that I check the team's website or their social media content including their pages on Facebook, Twitter and also any video uploaded on youtube. Some matches have a live link on mycujoo, so I check the matches after they finish from those videos.--Anbans 585 (talk) 20:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
2019 AFC Cup group stage
Regarding this edit, why did you remove source without any reason? Hhkohh (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
@Hhkohh: Sorry for the trouble, I changed it at that time because I thought that the AFC reference was pretty much sufficient, and the koora citation had bare reference. Though later on better citations were provided, to support the statement.--Anbans 585 (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
My edits
Can you explain why you continue undoing my edits like here.--Sakiv (talk) 00:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
@Sakiv: Sorry for reverting it. I reverted it at that time because the fact "by Iranian Law" was uncited. Thanks for providing a citation later on, I have also linked the page to the Visa policy of Iran page, which will give the readers more info.--Anbans 585 (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Very good. Thanks for the clarification.--Sakiv (talk) 00:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.18
Hello Anbans 585,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Djenaba Baradji
Maybe I'm missing something, but the squad list in the first reference on 2018 Africa Women Cup of Nations says that Djenaba Baradji is a midfielder, not a defender. Is there another reference that says she's a defender? TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:54, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
@TheCatalyst31: Na, my bad, her name is listed as an MF there, read her name as a DF when i reverted your edit. Feel free to revert.--Anbans 585 (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019
Hello Anbans 585,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
- QUALITY of REVIEWING
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
- Backlog
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
- Move to draft
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
- Notifying users
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
- PERM
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
- Other news
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
DRN notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for Dispute resolution noticeboard. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:2019 AFC Asian Cup and enter your statement here. Shorouq★The★Super★ninja2 (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
You removed {{cspan}} in 2020 AFC Women's Olympic Qualifying Tournament, but I restored it; {{cspan}} is used when there is no source about the description, regardless of it is true or not. --Sinryow (talk) 05:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Eagleash. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Basim Ali, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Eagleash (talk) 15:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Left Wiki
Just get the notification , you removed your name football project. Left wiki now? Dey subrata (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@Dey subrata: Na na, I thought that I didn't did much for Indian Football Wiki, like you guys usually do. So I thought that it is better to remove my name from the task force until I am much more of a contributor for Indian Football Wiki.--Anbans 585 (talk) 18:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Shalulile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your unintentional revert
On the first revert, read this Cambodian names. While on the second revert, read this previous edition of CONMENBOL World Cup qualification ⟩ 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL). Single phrase "Beto" should be used only when the article itself are named with "Beto" similar like Neymar, not his full name. RaymondSC (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Anbans 585. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |