User talk:Anaskhan444

September 2016

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|I want to know why i am blocked ?. If i create any mistake so guide me about that, i will never do that again.}} below. MER-C 12:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for copying plot summaries from external websites and evasion of the block I placed on User:ANASKHAN777 through editing while logged out (182.182.x.x) and illegitimate use of multiple accounts. Quite frankly, you do not have the required competence to edit Wikipedia. MER-C 04:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please...it is kindly request for you that please give me one more chance i will never do copying plot summaries from external websites again......please sir. Please unblock me frankly...it is request for you.

No. I stand by my assessment that you do not have the required skills to edit Wikipedia, particularly in written English -- as you have just demonstrated. MER-C 00:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iftar Mulaqat

The article Iftar Mulaqat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV, tagged for notability since 2016

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]