User talk:Anarchistemma

popular culture

i am trying to add a subsection to tributes and legacy for popular culture but i keep getting an error message. any idea why? Anarchistemma (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Day the Clown Cried— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 15:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Day the Clown Cried. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 14:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Lewis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chaplin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Anarchistemma. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! XSklzxDark (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of homosexuality in American film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scared Stiff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Lewis filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Anarchistemma, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Martin and Lewis have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Anarchistemma. You've again copied material directly from your source, which is a violation of copyright law and the copyright policy of this website. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that you may have copied things from a book. Did you? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

books

i did use a book cited for the article by Michael Hayde. I just now looked at at the article and the instances where you left the source are paraphrases of content, box office and ratings data. i would like to say that i now understand that, as you say, an article is not a series of cited lines drawn from a copyright source but should be paraphrased and then cited to show it is not my own original work. however i may use very short pieces with an in-line, then footnote citation. i would very much like to work to improve articles, not jeopardize wiki’s copyright regulations. since i care about this article, it may be better to revert it to its state before i attempted the revamp as now information is missing and it lacks cohesion. Anarchistemma (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]