User talk:Anandkanwar007

June 2020

Hello Anandkanwar007. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anandkanwar007. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anandkanwar007|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot, i have no commercial interest in getting the contents of this page changed. Am pointing this again since the information on this page is false. His name is not Suresh Kumar Raina, it is Suresh Raina. Am surprised how requesting a simple name change (erroneous one to the correct one) leads you to believe that. If you follow cricket in India, you will realise that not only is the name wrong but some stats have also not been updated. It is wrong to keep falase information on the page and question the veracity of true information even when presented by facts. Anandkanwar007 (talk) 09:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to have a "commercial interest" to be a paid editor. Do you know or represent this player? It's the only topic you have edited about. As stated previously, we use what independent sources use. If they have the player's name incorrect, you will need to speak to them. We also do not necessarily use official or legal names as article titles, see WP:COMMONNAME. The article about the 42nd President of the United States is at Bill Clinton, not his legal name of William Jefferson Clinton nor his birth name of William Jefferson Blythe. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]