User talk:Anaconda@prodigy.net
Please don't insert your personal opinion into Manuel Zelaya. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all edits. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please discuss your proposed edits on the article's Talk page. Your edits are becoming disruptive. Please also see WP:3RR. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Manuel Zelaya, you will be blocked from editing.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Manuel Zelaya. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Northern green anaconda, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Again, please do not add unsourced speculation to the article or present a specific study as absolute fact (also, please cite the study with Wikipedia:Citing sources). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)