User talk:Amyl1997

Welcome!

Hello, Amyl1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 14:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to EENA-112 have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JalenFolf, thanks for your feedback, it is much appreciated. We're a non-profit association and I based the content on the structure from other charity wikipedia pages - Save the Children for example. Would I get approval if I used some news articles about us rather than just our own website? :) Thank you! 2A02:C7F:56CF:6700:69B6:4CB6:8661:36F6 (talk) 07:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa, this content is from our own website and I am the copyright holder. Is it still not ok to share because of that? And would rewriting help? Thank you so much for your help. 2A02:C7F:56CF:6700:69B6:4CB6:8661:36F6 (talk) 07:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying material from another website is almost never OK. Either you're violating the website's copyright, or releasing the copyright so that anybody can do as they wish with it, or placing the organisation's view of itself on Wikipedia in Wikipedia's voice. Wikipedia is not an extension of the organisation's website. Any Wikipedia article should be based on the outside world's view of the organisation, grounded in citations from reliable, verifiable, independent sources. The organisation also needs to satisfy the notability thresholds for organisations. Cabayi (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to EENA-112. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{JalenFolf}}, I have rewritten the content to be objectively neutral and included only external sources regarding EENA's work. They are a non-profit organisation and there is no advertising/promotion. Can you please advise me as to why the entire page has been removed? I don't understand how things such as the founding date or website address are considered advertising or promotion as these are also on the pages of other non-profits. Thank you. Amyl1997 (talk) 13:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply to|JalenFolf}} hi, I am just pinging you here (I think I did it incorrectly the first time) Amyl1997 (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amyl1997

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Amyl1997 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 15:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Amyl1997 (talk) 15:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted Wikipedia for advice on page publishing, and was told that I can make a draft on my own userspace and tag an editor who will then review the content for me and offer some advice. I did this and tagged the editor who responded to me.

I have removed the tag. However, you need to use one of the Template:Reply to templates, such as ping| to actually tag an editor. GPL93 (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I have done so now :) Amyl1997 (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your draft to Draft:EENA. Before making any other edits, you should now read WP:PAID and make the required declarations on your userpage and on the draft's talk page.

I have deleted and salted the redirect at EENA-112 as you assert it is causing real-life confusion, imperilling life. Cabayi (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ahem, "make the required declarations ... on the draft's talk page". Cabayi (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, now on both my talk page and the draft talk page :) Amyl1997 (talk) 13:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EENA (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EENA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amyl1997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 12:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Emergency Number Association (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Emergency Number Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Emergency Number Association (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Emergency Number Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:European Emergency Number Association

Hello, Amyl1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "European Emergency Number Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:42, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]