User talk:Amy. Firehoof.

I am changing it to say British because on Wikipedia the nationality of the town is generally listed (e.g. Delhi is an Indian City, New York is an American city) not any subdivisions of that nation

And I'm not saying it isn't in wales I am simply listing the country it is in over the subdivision. Anything that Is in wales is by default in the U.K. And I did not remove all traces of wales from the article. I simply clarified that wales is a part of the UK, not an independent country (please accept this fact)

I didn't "vandalise" Wikipedia. I corrected misleading information. Seriously. Stop it with the hyper Welsh nationalism and accept that wales is a part of the UK, so anything and anywhere Welsh is also British, same as how anything Texan is also American

You've done quite a bit more than you claim. If you continue has you have been, you may find your self blocked from editing for disruption. Thanks, Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Car gwyllt. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

This is neither an endorsement of, nor a rejection of, the content you're trying to change. It is a notification that your conduct violates Wikipedia norms, which renders you vulnerable to being blocked. Please use the articles' Talk pages instead of doing what you're doing.NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you return, I cannot overemphasize the importance of "use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors," as well as the other advise given above. I would recommend less bold in the future and more discussion prior to making such changes. Thanks, Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Conwy County Borough, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem with Welsh?

Removal of the Welsh name for places, as you did in the North Wales article with the edit summary "removing irrelevant info" is highly suspect. How is the Welsh name for "North Wales" irrelevant? You seem to have a problem with Wales and the Welsh. Please stop damaging Wikipedia articles to promote your own biases. Your edit to Car gwyllt is also incorrect and has been reverted. Railfan23 (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the location of Penarth, a town in Wales to United Kingdom is both inaccurate and a clear violation of Wikipedia's policy on personal bias. Please stop. Meanwhile this edit is petulant vandalism, and clearly factually incorrect. Please stop. Railfan23 (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Car gwyllt. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you ma'am

thank you for adding some more specificty (i hoped i spelled that right) to some articles about the UK. im having fun learning about you country

SilvermountainhorsepineappleUK (talk) 17:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Railfan23 (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]