User talk:Amritmaury
April 2020
[edit]Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. edugayans.com techsnm.in Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
edugayans.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://www.edugayans.com
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hi Amritmaury,
there is an additional concern about your text additions, especially at Second law of thermodynamics. Let's assume that you do hold the exclusive copyright to the text added to Adobe Dreamweaver and Part of speech, and that you have copied it from an internet source you had originally submitted your text to. That's almost fine (WP:DCM), but the text wasn't encyclopedic and isn't suitable for Wikipedia, regardless of any copyright considerations.
Your addition to Second law of thermodynamics, contrary to the other additions, is, well, impressive. This might have been written entirely in your own words, but I'll openly say that I don't believe this. I believe that you have plagiarized that text somewhere, then published the plagiarism on a website, and then copied the website content to Wikipedia. That's not okay under any circumstances.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC) |