User talk:Amorparamipatria

Amorparamipatria, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Amorparamipatria! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Your recent editing history at Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. W C M_email 13:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amorparamipatria 11/10/2014:

Dear player,

I simply cannot agree with the changes you've made in the Falklands Sovereignty Dispute thread. Everything that I've written is backed with sources. You keep deleting it while it's historically correct, claiming that it's false.

EDIT: I have added a little note to your talk page.

Its not historically correct, nor it is neutrally written. WP:RS requires a neutral academic source for historical fact, not propaganda from the Argentine Government. Rest assured while I won't indulge you in an edit war, I will be seeking administrative action if you persist in adding biased material. W C M_email 13:52, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- 11/10/2014: I simply don't agree with you. I've even provided a map from that time (I think it was from Reinel) that supports the Argentinian claim. I have the feeling the Argentinian claim isn't in line with your personal opinion, and that that's why you deleted it.

I care not whether you agree with me or not. I care not whether Reinel supports the Argentine claim or not (it doesn't by the way he was Portuguese). But I do care about editors who seek to use Wikipedia to promote a POV. If you want to read a neutral summary of the discovery see History of the Falkland Islands#European discovery and I would also suggest you read about Projection bias ie projecting your own motivation onto others. W C M_email 14:06, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-11/10/2014: Thank you for proving that you haven't read the sources! Reinel made a map in the 16th century proving the Argentinian claim.