User talk:Amoguslol

Dogs Vs Cats

Which is Better? Amoguslol (talk) 19:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Government of Macedonia (ancient kingdom). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm CopperyMarrow15. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Among Us have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 18:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blues songs

Hello, Amoguslol,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Harrz, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Blues songs for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Harrz}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

harrz ^talk 17:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Harrz}}

This page should not be speedily deleted because it's a work in progress and i still need time to work on it. i'm a beginner editor and making an entirely new page will probably take a while, so please don't delete it. Thank You for your time! --~~~~ Amoguslol (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blues songs

Hello Amoguslol,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Blues songs, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Blues. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 20:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SimmeD (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Talk:AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SimmeD (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm SimmeD. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SimmeD (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amoguslol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I made bad choices. I was upset because I was trying to make something new, and when it was randomly deleted, it made me mad. So i'll leave it alone, just please unblock me. Amoguslol (talk) 20:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have essentially done nothing other than vandalize Wikipedia. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amoguslol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not only vandalized wikipedia. I have made some good edits, and the only situation was my recent outburst. I feel like the admin looked at my history for only 5 seconds before declining. Please, unblock me. This outburst will not happen again.

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your edits. You started with a half dozen vandal edits, made about five maybe ok edits, and then proceeded to do nothing but vandalize. No thanks. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Amoguslol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't mean to keep bothering, but I don't understand why my block was indefinite.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't mean to keep bothering, but I don't understand why my block was indefinite. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't mean to keep bothering, but I don't understand why my block was indefinite. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't mean to keep bothering, but I don't understand why my block was indefinite. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

(Non-administrator comment) Hello! Indefinite does not mean infinite, and the block may be lifted once a reviewing administrator decides that you can be trusted for a second chance. For that, it is usually helpful to show that you understand the reason why you were blocked, and give examples of constructive edits that you would like to make.

In your specific case, it could also be good to provide reassurances that you will be better at dealing with the outbursts that you mentioned previously. Your username might also be a hurdle to being taken seriously, and, while not mandatory, requesting a username change could help show that you are here to edit constructively. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]