User talk:Amirkhosroo

November 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not modify neutral references unnecessarily in an attempt to WP:POVPUSH ChunnuBhai (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. And why are you mass changing the access dates to November 22, 2020? All in a span of seconds and minutes? Some1 (talk) 14:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marybeth Davis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --GouramiWatcher^Talk 07:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joyce Gilchrist. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You were warned on 07:41, 30 November 2020‎ by Gourami Watcher and you are still making the same edits after your warning [1][2]. Some1 (talk) 14:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC) Some1 (talk) 14:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amirkhosroo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amirkhosroo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change access-dates

I have noticed that you have been changing the access-date fields of citations on a number of pages. It is quite unnecessary, and possibly misleading. The original date when the content was accessed is perfectly fine. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I echo the above statement. You've been reverted by multiple editors and you still continue to misleadingly change the access dates after being warned. Not to mention, you changed the access-date to 2022 in this edit... https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Osama_bin_Laden&diff=prev&oldid=990340696 Some1 (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW there is nothing inherently wrong with changing the access-date since it reflects when the object was last accessed and verified, not when the cite was created. However given the speed of edits (15 in 1 one minute, or 1 edit every 4 seconds), it's impossible these were manually verified. Plus there appears to be some sort of undisclosed automated tool or bot involved. Given the trivial nature of the edits (wikilinking 1 word, changing the date of 1 citation) this gives the appearance of an account building up an edit history for some later purpose. -- GreenC 14:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought too [3]. Some1 (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent was 17 edits in 1 minute. They are automating edits without a bot flag, accounts have been permanent banned for that. -- GreenC 14:38, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for For continuing to change accessdates for unknown reason without giving a supporting edit summary & not responding on your talk page to concerns about this. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Keith D (talk) 12:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for as other editors have requested the block be indefinite because of the speed and BOT appearance of the edits made.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Ismail Lika

added a link pointing to New York

Princ Dobroshi

added a link pointing to Ringerike

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]