User talk:American Patriot J
Official Statement from Contributor
[edit]As I write this publicly, I am making a statement in which I would be staying on the Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia page, and I will bring forth the allegations against me concerning "sockpuppetry" to the Wikipedia Arbitrary Committee. I have taken an approximation of two to three weeks since I have last posted a contribution on Wikipedia for this sole Purpose; to insure that I am doing the right thing for the sake of the community-at-hand, and for my dignity. I strongly feel that I was wrongly accused of "sockpuppetry" and even if the technical evidence is conclusive; the Administrators who decided to permanently ban me outright did not look closely into their own Conscience to realize that my contributions weren't violating any Rule or Term in the Conditions. I am fully aware that the Administrations, whom are chosen by popularity, don't necessary care for their own Conscience nor Due Process of Law in regards to all aspects of Life, Liberty and Property, even on the Internet. For this type of behavior or mentality, I will not go away by any stretch of the imagination because I feel strongly in the Cause of Wikipedia in delivering non-partisan, objectively morally justifiable information to educate the general populace. If you are an Administrator or a Member of the Arbitrary Committee who wish to comment on this statement, I'll reckon that you do not revert my own Talk Page to its previous State nor delete this State, and post a comment in the following section below. American Patriot J (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Comments for Administrators and Arbitrary Committee Members Only
[edit]Leave Your Comments Here Below, with Signature
Comments for Other Contributors
[edit]Leave Your Comments Here Below, with Signature, and Keep it Civil and Objective.
Archived Requests
[edit]
American Patriot J (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like my block to be reviewed due to the fact that an Administrator quickly banned my internet protocol address, a couple of seconds after another administrator was preparing for a checklist user in the following case:Sockpuppet Investigation, Allegation. It's quite unfair that another administrator can instantly ban an individual while another administrator, within seconds, decides to ban me without notice of any kind. I would like for you to check out the investigation and read through my defense, as well as the allegations against me. Also, the administrator who banned me within seconds after the announcement that the checkuser was being initiated; he or she said that I was "AssociateJ" but the investigation was about "CentristFiasco". How does this connect to the Rules and Regulations of the Wikipedia site? This is a violation as I think about this logically. I'm hoping to get a proper hearing on the matter, thanks. American Patriot J (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please submit your unblock request via your main account, thanks. WilliamH (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
American Patriot J (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sorry for appealing this block for the second time but the administrator who left a comment stated that I have to log onto my main account. What if I told you I don't have a main account? This is my only account, I'm not kidding. Even if I did have a main account I couldn't log onto it because the administrator on the investigation IP blocked me. Does the administrator who revoked the appeal know this or he trying to be a jokester? This isn't funny. Repost Reason: I would like my block to be reviewed due to the fact that an Administrator quickly banned my internet protocol address, a couple of seconds after another administrator was preparing for a checklist user in the following case:Sockpuppet Investigation, Allegation. It's quite unfair that another administrator can instantly ban an individual while another administrator, within seconds, decides to ban me without notice of any kind. I would like for you to check out the investigation and read through my defense, as well as the allegations against me. Also, the administrator who banned me within seconds after the announcement that the checkuser was being initiated; he or she said that I was "AssociateJ" but the investigation was about "CentristFiasco". How does this connect to the Rules and Regulations of the Wikipedia site? This is a violation as I think about this logically. I'm hoping to get a proper hearing on the matter, thanks. American Patriot J (talk) 00:59, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is a checkuser confirmed sock account, blocked on technical evidence by two checkusers and behavioral evidence. I'm sorry that you feel it is a joke. Kuru (talk) 01:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.