User talk:American2

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, American2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --StuffOfInterest 14:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job!

Your edits to the 9/11 protests with the timeline were excellent. --In ur base, killing ur dorfs 00:46, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to United States gubernatorial elections, 2006

Your recent edit to United States gubernatorial elections, 2006 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Praise

I merely wanted to drop a note thanking you for your work in updating the election-related articles. Excellent work! · j e r s y k o talk · 19:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Illegal drug trade

For helping to make the internet not suck, I ReverendG award to you the Banner of Unsuckiness.

Islom Karimov

Thanks for adding those sources! KazakhPol 19:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information from www.seds.org

Please do not use information from the SEDS website. The SEDS website is unreliable; much of the information on the website is unreferenced or out-of-date. The distance measurements from SEDS.org are particularly useless. Please contact me if you have questions about my comments. Dr. Submillimeter 18:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michele Bachmann

Please expand on why you believe that the article is cluttered. I don’t have a problem with moving the segment on her political positions lower in the article or reviewing the wording and layout of that whole segment (most of that went up during the 2006 campaign and could use an overhaul), but I don’t see how cutting and pasting the segments on her history makes the article more readable. The events of her personal life directly influence each stage of her political activity so seperating these into seperate tracks results in a loss of understanding on what motivates and drives her.

--Wowaconia 01:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Good job on your sourcing campaign. Tewfik^Talk 04:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast. I reverted your edit to the Swift Boat Vets article. The two sources you removed had valid citations, including publisher, author, date and page. That is a valid complete citation, whether there is a live url there or not. I checked the URL's as well, and one that you removed went to a live abstract. But in any case, please don't remove valid citations to reliable sources, just because there is not a convenient and free url to click on. Citations were being written long before the internet existed, and those articles can still be verified through purchase, library microfilm, or other methods offline. URLs are only there as a convenience. A complete citation with no URL is actually preferable to a URL-only citation, because when the link goes dead, we still have the publication information, and a new URL can usually be found using that info. - Crockspot 18:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- update I went back and double checked, one of the sources (Boston Herald) didn't actually have all the cite info needed to verify, (no date of publication), and I was not able to find the original article in a news archive search based only on the title and publication name, so I removed that one again. Just be careful about links. They are not required for a valid citation. As long as there is enough info for some kid to look the news article up at his library, it's good to go. - Crockspot 18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wynn Las Vegas

I saw that you added a 'reference'. Please try to use the reference tag and one of the citation templates so that the references can be fully attributed in the article. I updated this one for you so you can see what to do. Thanks. Vegaswikian 18:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead ref's

Please read WP:DEADREF to learn how to deal with dead references. Simply removing the entire reference is not appropriate. --Veritas (talk) 17:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, American2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bram Stoker Award for Best Graphic Novel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabriel Rodriguez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]