Jump to content

User talk:Amercenier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Glenn Meganck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JHMM13 21:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I will have to research the particulars and add them to the article. Thanks for bearing with me as this is my first attempt at this. {{subst:Amercenier}}

It's not that I know he is non-notable, it's just that we feel Wikipedia has to assume someone is non-notable and his notability has to be asserted by the creator of the article. I'm sure he's a very good author. :-D JHMM13 22:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

[edit]

Hi; when you send a message to another user, it is usual to sign it with four tildes ( ~~~~). That way we can tell from whom it has come, which otherwise is quite dificult.--Anthony.bradbury 23:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]