User talk:Amazondotnessa

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jon Walker, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jon Walker was changed by Amazondotnessa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889368 on 2010-12-10T23:10:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Walker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --Addi hockey 10^e-mail 23:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jon Walker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HalfShadow 23:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 23:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amazondotnessa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I restore the true appearance of the wiki page about Jon Walker. The Rest are vandalising! Amazondotnessa (talk) 5:20 pm, Today (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

So in other words you have no plans to change behavior like this. Thanks. That's all we needed to know. - Vianello (Talk) 23:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will stop it right now. The wiki page looks ok right now.

Stop what? You just said you weren't vandalizing and that you were only "restoring its true appearance". I would hate to accuse you of lying. - Vianello (Talk) 23:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page semi-protected due to extensive sock/meat puppetry. Favonian (talk) 23:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]