User talk:Alvinkallicharran7

Conflict of interest

if you really are Alvin, the please see WP:COI which details why you should not be editing the article about yourself.. Please feel free to make suggestions on the talk page and other editors will help decide if they are appropriate. Spike 'em (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have concerns about the article, please take a look at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Relationship between the subject, the article, and Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. There are ways for you to seek the help for you to address. You need to understand, however, that Wikipedia articles are written about subject, not written for or written on behalf of subjects; in other words, this is not your Wikipedia article and you have no claim of ownership or final editorial control over it as explained in Wikipedia:Ownership of content. So, if you persist in trying to force through your preferred version in disregard of relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines by edit warring, an administrator will be asked to intervene, which in turn will most likely lead to your account being blocked to prevent any further disruption. Spike 'em is an experienced editor when it comes to articles related to cricket; so, if you post edit requests at Talk:Alvin Kallicharran, they or another editor will be happy to help you sort things out.

Wikipedia had no way of knowing who you really are (see On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog for why this is the case), but Wikipedia is also part of the WP:REALWORLD; so, every edit you make to Wikipedia is there for any to see. If you're claiming to be the subject of a Wikipedia article and want others to believe you, then you should take a look at WP:REALNAME. In some cases, if an account is claiming to be the subject of an article but is continuing to make edits considered to be disruptive, the account might be soft-blocked as a precaution against damaging impersonation until it can be properly verified. Having your account verified won't give you any sort of special editorial control over the article, but it will at least let others know that you are the subject of the article. If you would like to have your account verified, please email Wikimedia OTRS and an OTRS volunteer will help you to do so. You're not required to do this, but it might help things if you intended to keep trying to edit content on Wikipedia about you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alvin Kallicharran, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Alvin Kallicharran shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:55, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you try to restore the article to your preferred version once again, an administrator will be asked to step in. As I posted above, there are ways for you to seek assistance and there are editors who are willing to help you sort things out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Somethings to say here

Hey there. Just to make sure you are familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines and manual of style: 1. You don't own the article. Nobody owns anything, either you created it, or it is an article about you. There's no owner. 2. if you want to divide into sections, use the headings given at the top bar. 3. If you are connected with the subject, don't edit it. You can request edits at a talk page, but please cite reliable, independent sources.\ 4. Wikipedia explains stuff in a neutral point of view. We only say the facts given by sources. It is also not an essay. Hope you get these things and hope you do better edits next time, I believe in you. Gerald WL ✉ 04:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Alvinkallicharran7, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice,. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Some recent edits by this account seem to indicate it is shared among multiple people, so that also needs to be addressed. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]