User talk:Althepal/Archive 2

Speedy deletion of Lavabit

A tag has been placed on Lavabit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Martijn Hoekstra 20:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Ariel,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:BirdBeaksA.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 3, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-03. howcheng {chat} 19:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

That's neat, Howcheng! :) Althepal 03:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MeizuM8.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:MeizuM8.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MacosxlogoX1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MacosxlogoX1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IBMlogo.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:IBMlogo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Pricing comment

I get what you're saying and I agree that there were too many currencies and conversions happening. I simply didn't understand why there were random currencies listed but not the Euro, which is one of the four major currencies (USD, Euro, pound, yen). I must point out the prices in Euros and Dollars I had in there were 100% correct and I was not implying that they're the same in value. But Leopard does in fact sell for $129 and €129 (rip off for Europe I know).

Anyhow an updated table of all the different prices for Leopard and the currency it sells in is provided for in the main Mac OS X article. I linked to that table in the intro of the Leopard article. This way the intro is not cluttered with the many different prices and versions of Leopard (retail, family pack, server, academic, etc.) and its random currencies. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nja247 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, but I'd still like to see a source for the euro thing. Althepal 04:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[1] - click on any store where the country uses the Euro and you'll see the pricing. Cheers. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. So I guess people in Europe will buy it from Amazon.com in dollars, huh? ;) -Althepal 17:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Winvista.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Winvista.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

PhotoLine 32

Hi! It seems like you created PhotoLine 32, so you might like to know that I'm proposing it for deletion because it seems to be a non-notable definition only linked from a couple lists. It'd be great if you could improve it a bit more, but I'm not sure it has much potential... Dreamyshade (talk) 00:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

You know, I think it is a fairly well-known program. I don't use it, but it was listed so I wanted it to have an article that someone else could expand. Sorry but I can't do that myself. Althepal (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Winvista.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Winvista.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Windows Vista

I noticed your comment on the Vista FAC page and that info is included in the Criticism Section Alexfusco5 02:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I specifically meant about mentioning that high numbers of businesses and people say they don't want to upgrade; that is an interesting point. I didn't see it in the criticism section, but I didn't carefully read the article either. Althepal 04:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi it was a good piece of info.. I did a copyedit though... :) Mugunth^{(ping me!!!,contribs)} 16:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC) I also feel that second and third sections, specially the list of new features section does not seem to be a "Featured Article" stuff.. how do u feel?Mugunth^{(ping me!!!,contribs)} 16:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry. The Firefox spellchecker doesn't seem to be working 100% properly lately. I think those sections are pretty good, they have lots of interesting information. Of course they could be made better, but I think it is good enough to be featured. Anyway, that's what the vote is for. ;) Althepal 19:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Gimpiconnew.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Gimpiconnew.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:21, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SAT Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:SAT Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of MinWin

I have nominated MinWin, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MinWin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Windows Vista Orb

Hi I was wondering if there's a place where I could find the svg image of the Vista Orb you made...I could really use it...Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Max611987 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think I still have it, and it's not online anymore. Maybe this will help: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/presskits/windowsvista/images/WinVista-Button_rgb.jpg Althepal (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Encarta2007Screenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Encarta2007Screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Helicon soft logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Helicon soft logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hfocus410.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hfocus410.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Mozillafirefox2.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mozillafirefox2.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 18:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Mozillathunderbird2.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mozillathunderbird2.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 19:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fine. I've never seen so much care about what OS is being used before... Whatever. Windows and OS X are used all over Wikipedia for programs which are Linux-compatible and their rationals are not contested. (Even the beta image I replaced with my Thunderbird screenshot was originally on Windows (with no rational form at all) and it wasn't contested.) If you want programs to look like they are from the '90s, fine, but I highly doubt this is needed and still haven't seen anything saying that Linux must be used for screenshots. But could you please at least use Kubuntu or a nice theme so it doesn't make the program's appear outdated? Althepal (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

budgerigar photo

I noticed a budgerigar photo in use on wikipedia section on budgerigars. The budgerigar has a description of an OPalINE BUDGERIGAR. This title to the picture

• 

is in fact incorrect as this budgerigar is NOT an opaline budgerigar but what is called a "normal" budgerigar. Any chance this can be edited so the article is correct ?

Cheers karen

It looks like you took care of that. I did not write "opaline" anyway. Althepal (talk) 07:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Cs2andpixel.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Cs2andpixel.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Its not used on Wikipedia pages, so no point anyway. I just took the two screenshots for the two programs already found on Wikipedia and put them together... no website. Can that make it a free copyright? I doubt it. Althepal (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:iPhoneOS.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:iPhoneOS.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KelleyCook (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC) I know you meant well, but I don't think this photoshop edit is going to get by the Fair Use cabal. Might as well bring it up now. -- KelleyCook (talk) 20:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IPhoneOS.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IPhoneOS.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Moved List of Mac OS X software to AfD

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from List of Mac OS X software, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mac OS X software, which overrides the need for a {{prod}} tag. I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination. Thanks! Klausness (talk) 16:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Moved List of old Macintosh software to AfD

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from List of old Macintosh software, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. I have nominated the article for deletion instead; the debate may be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of old Macintosh software, which overrides the need for a {{prod}} tag. I have explained my reasons for doing this in my nomination. Thanks! Klausness (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Iphone os.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Iphone os.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Signature question

Hey, in my preferences I typed in a signature but it still shows up unsigned when I post. Can you tell me what I am doing wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by WinCEB (talk • contribs) 01:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You need to type ~~~~ at the end of your comments every time. It's not automatic. Althepal (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Althepal, I guess I'm a true Wikipedian now!

If you ever get tired of chatting with me, let me know and I'll stop filling up your page. I will respect your wishes. I can talk technology all the time so I enjoy this. Talk later... -Chad WinCEB (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I like technology too. :) When I get tired I'll tell you. You know there is a irc at irc://irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-social next time I see you respond maybe I'll check if you're online there. Althepal (talk) 03:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Althepal, I'll try to look at that site tomorrow. I like the new section, I'll try to respond to that too. -Chad —Preceding unsigned comment added by WinCEB (talk • contribs) 02:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, forget about the irc. I'm not gonna use it. Althepal (talk) 18:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Xpvistaleopardchangewave.png

Can you do an SVG version? --soum ^talk 19:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I can, but it won't look as nice and it would take some time to draw... is there anything wrong with the PNG? I can do it in a different res if you want, but I don't know if it's worth the time to draw the SVG unless there is some reason. You see, I did it in Numbers so it was pretty much typing in the different numbers and boom I got a nice chart, but if I make an SVG in Inkscape, I would have to measure the different values, plus it wouldn't look as nice with the 3D and all. Althepal (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you export the spreadsheet to Microsoft Excel format? If you you can copy the graph to Microsoft Visio and save it in SVG format. If you don't have Visio, you can send it to me. --soum ^talk 05:00, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't have Visio. I have Excel, and I could export and then upload an Excel file somewhere online, but it would be easier if you just make the chart in Excel yourself. Purchase rate, Q2 08 is 20% vista, 53% xp, 8% leopard. "Highly satisfied" corporate user rate is 8% vista, 40% xp, 53% leopard. Althepal (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The textures are not vectors. :-( --soum ^talk 05:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Well how important is it that we have SVG? Althepal (talk) 06:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Not very. Thats why I have given up! Its just that if it ain't photographic, vector images scale much better. Thats why I prefer SVGs if it is possible. --soum ^talk 06:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I prefer SVGs too, but that chart already looks soooo nice. :-) Like I said, I could make it a different size if it's needed. (I don't know how the graphics in Numbers works, but I can stretch or squeeze them. Maybe it's vector with texture. You can do those, you know.) Althepal (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I recreated the graph with Excel, but since Excel does not come with these textures, I had to get it from your graph. When thats exported to SVG, the textures are embedded as bitmaps within the SVG file, and MediaWiki worse-than-chokes on them. So, unless the textures can be exported as vectors, we are stuck with PNG.

Yeah the chart looks nice, but I tend to prefer ones with solid colors and gradients, not textures. Like this. Anyway, that is not something to edit war over. :-P --soum ^talk 17:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you want to change it, it's okay with me. You can use solid colors in excel, with or without 3D, and make it SVG. I don't mind that much anyhow. Althepal (talk) 17:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Reception Section Unbalanced Again

Hello Althepal, been a lull in our conversations so I thought I would spark it up again. In your reception section it is unbalanced again now that you added a twist to the end about the benefits of gaming to make it a question whether it is better. The whole section now seems to be a vista crusher rather than sticking to the facts. The amount of debate over Directx 10 is so small, it doesn't warrant adding that sentence in to throw it off. Developers switched to DirectX 10 as soon as hardware was for sale. All the information I have found show HUGE benefits over DirectX 10 in performance and visuals. If you refuse to remove it, I will add a sentence after that to a notable source showing the huge benefits in performance over DirectX 9. On my PC dual booting XP and Vista, all my games, including DirectX 9 games runing 33% to 50% faster under Vista which contridicts the sentence you added about gaming performance being debated. I haven't looked at that other site in a few days because the comments are too slow so if you been writing me there, I may not see it. Take care WinCEB (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Chad. I didn't add that, and it looks like soum already removed the questionable text, so that settles that. :-) I don't think I'm gonna be on Wikipedia much for a while, so don't expect immediate responses to talk pages, and don't be surprised if I don't change the Vista article or go to talk pages at all. Cya, Althepal (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Althepal, hope I haven't made you mad or anything. Nothing has been at you other than just debating. You are a very smart person and your POV is certainly just as good as mine or anybody else. You have become quite a friend to me. Hope you stick around!!! By the way, I got me a new camera, the Canon S5 IS. Have you ever seen it in stores? WinCEB (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'm not mad. Just kind of busy. The S5 is a really terrific camera... if I didn't already have my Fujifilm, I might buy it. Or the new Fuji, or the new Sony. They're all really good. Have fun. :-) Althepal (talk) 23:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I guess I'm not as busy as I thought. But still, I'm kind of done with Vista's article. I put in a lot of work to make sure it had all the important reception information while still being NPOV, so it's pretty good, and I'll let the article take its course now. If you bring up something on my talk page, I'll probably respond, and you know it's fine by me to discuss cameras and nature photography, not just computers. Althepal (talk) 20:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

English Budgie

Okay, I like all your pics but there is something about English Budgie that I like. This guy just looks like he enjoys the picture moments! Good job on your pics. WinCEB (talk) 23:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, he's quite a character! Always getting into stuff... :) *sigh* Thanks for the compliments. Althepal (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

New icon

Hey Althepal, that new icon for the Windows wikiproject is great... I like it better than what's there now, and I'll certainly support its use. -/- Warren 00:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad you like it. I'm hoping it replaces the current bland or off-colored icons. I suggested it on Warren's talk page so maybe he could do something about it. I'm not sure where to nominate a change or if I should just change it, so I just told Warren about it. If you support that icon, that's great! :) Thank you. But now I'm really not going to be on Wikipedia for a few days, so I'll check back then and see if there has been any progress. TTYL, Althepal (talk) 16:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Err, I -am- Warren? :-) -/- Warren 04:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

LOL! Oops, sorry. I thought you were WinCEB (didn't check, expected him on my talk, started with "W"). Well, then. So should I just change the templates? Althepal (talk) 04:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I changed the templates. Hope it makes Wikipedia a nicer place! :) Althepal (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

OS-specific userbox

Warren, what about OS-specific userboxes (eg "this user uses Windows XP")? You think I should put my icon in there too, leave those icons alone, or make different versions of this icon for XP, Vista, etc.? Althepal (talk) 19:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Copy and paste edits

If you are going to copy and paste content from one article to another, please respect other editors contributions and make it clear where you are sourcing the content from by mentioning the article title in your edit summaries. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I'll keep that in mind in the future. Thanks. Althepal (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Althepal, looks like you made some guy mad. It happens every time you turn. Have a nice day. WinCEB (talk) 01:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Haha, yeah.... Thanks. Althepal (talk) 04:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)