User talk:Alsadye215

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amplifier Game Invest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alsadye215! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shadow311 (talk) 01:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Amplifier Game Invest has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Amplifier Game Invest. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 01:42, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IntentionallyDense was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amplifier Game Invest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One source is insufficient to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amplifier Game Invest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amplifier Game Invest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is no content in this draft, just a single sentence saying they exist, and a list of subsidiaries. And there are still no independent sources – all the sources are press releases or closely based on press releases, and several of them don't even mention Amplifier Game Invest, so what is the purpose of having them there? (Case in point: reference 1.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amplifier Game Invest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello Alsadye215. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alsadye215. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alsadye215|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 12:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to tell you that no one pays me and I am an ordinary person who likes to create articles. This is my first article on Wikipedia and my goal is to be a source for people. Alsadye215 (talk) 12:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amplifier Game Invest (September 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As before. No claim to notability, no independent sources. While some text has been added, there's no actual content, only a bunch of poorly written bullet points listing run-of-the-mill events, and much of it is not even sourced.

bonadea contributions talk 18:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me? What do you want? You want sources that wrote sources. You want information that I wrote for you more information than half the number of pages on Wikipedia and then you cancel the article that I worked hours on with just the click of a button. I want to talk to the person who cancelled my article Alsadye215 (talk) 18:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six different people provided information to you about what is required before the draft was finally rejected (nothing has been "cancelled"). If you are indeed interested in helping the rest of us improve Wikipedia, you'll need to read and understand that information – and ideally not start out as an editor by trying to create a new article, since that is a very difficult and complex task. If you spend a few months making significant improvements to other articles before attempting to create new articles, you will probably find it a lot less frustrating. --bonadea contributions talk 19:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You told me you wanted sources and in the article there are 20 sources.

Why are there articles that contain 4 or 5 sources and you agree with them? Alsadye215 (talk) 21:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We told you (several times on this very user talk page) that

the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

reliable

secondary

strictly independent of the subject

There are no such sources in the draft, much less multiple sources. What makes you so eager to create an article about this topic? How did you acquire the copyright to their logo, and where do all the unsourced details come from? --bonadea contributions talk 21:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alsadye215 (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]