User talk:Almasur
November 2013
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Afro-Mexican has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Afro-Mexican was changed by Almasur (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891177 on 2013-11-03T06:12:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi Almasur! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Afro Latin America
[edit]Concerning the afro latin populations of north(Mexico),middle, and South America, no matter how small the percent of africa heritage they have, they still mark multiracial as opposed to the majority bi racial (spanish/indian) (portugese/indian). Latin America can in no way possible be compared to Southern Europe because Latin America has a very old and long history of caste systems in which black, native, Portuguese, and spanish have always played a major role in. Therefore if a person is only 1/16 of african heritage or just about 5%, in Latin America their caste still wouldn't be mestizo as it is predominantly used(bi racial). They would be pardo or mestizo(tri racial). This is the case in Mexico's black and mixed population, who identify themselves as the various african descended castes that are labeled in the infobox, as well as Venezuela, and Brazil. They are not completely african, but they are descended from African, Indigenous, Portuguese, and Spanish. They note that, the countries note that, and the castes note that. Thank you.JJJNosay (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Afro-Latin American
[edit]I have started a discussion at Talk:Afro-Latin American about whether to use a social or genetic-based interpretation for the population figures. As you have edited these figures in the past I'm letting you know in case you have something to add. Tobus (talk) 09:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)