Jump to content

User talk:Almasur

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


November 2013

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Afro-Mexican has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Almasur! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Afro Latin America

[edit]

Concerning the afro latin populations of north(Mexico),middle, and South America, no matter how small the percent of africa heritage they have, they still mark multiracial as opposed to the majority bi racial (spanish/indian) (portugese/indian). Latin America can in no way possible be compared to Southern Europe because Latin America has a very old and long history of caste systems in which black, native, Portuguese, and spanish have always played a major role in. Therefore if a person is only 1/16 of african heritage or just about 5%, in Latin America their caste still wouldn't be mestizo as it is predominantly used(bi racial). They would be pardo or mestizo(tri racial). This is the case in Mexico's black and mixed population, who identify themselves as the various african descended castes that are labeled in the infobox, as well as Venezuela, and Brazil. They are not completely african, but they are descended from African, Indigenous, Portuguese, and Spanish. They note that, the countries note that, and the castes note that. Thank you.JJJNosay (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Afro-Latin American

[edit]

I have started a discussion at Talk:Afro-Latin American about whether to use a social or genetic-based interpretation for the population figures. As you have edited these figures in the past I'm letting you know in case you have something to add. Tobus (talk) 09:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]