User talk:Alma Fordi

Welcome!

Hello, Alma Fordi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nicole Mandich, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dawn Bard (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dawn Bard (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My article about Nicole Mandich shall stay because I am going to find more links for this person.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Alma Fordy (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User AlmaFordi will unblocked and then will be deleted immediately to avoid vandalism. The article about Nicole Mandich will be established only by User AP37, not by AlmaFordi. Vanjagenjie, please unblock user AlmaFordi so then I would delete it to avoid vandalism and sock-puppet issues, today. Please! I promise I will never vandalize anything ever again.

Decline reason:

There's no way to delete accounts, therefore no reason to unblock this account. Yamla (talk) 14:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alma Fordi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need AlmaFordi to be unblocked so I can finish editing Nicole Mandich because I need to add categories and references about her. Please unblock Alma Fordi, today. Please!

Decline reason:

This account stays blocked. You have an request at your main account, so there is no reason to unblock this one. Peridon (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Peridon, what is my main account?

I've just raised this point at the investigation. I've just checked up, and to me, it looks like this one was the first one created (that we know of...), and therefore should be regarded as the main one. Peridon (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I got the times right but not the dated. It's Alma Fordy that is the earliest, unless you know something more. Peridon (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicole Mandich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Mandich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Mandich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC) The article about Nicole Mandich will stay because on January 15 because I can continue editing her.[reply]