User talk:Allyally26

Welcome!

Hello, Allyally26, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M. (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mar11 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mar11 (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Allyally26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mar11 (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M. has been accepted

Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

advice

I've just rescued your article on the Gallery and on Leoncillo. Please do not enter rough translations, especially translations made directly with the WP translate facility, into the English WP. Our practice is that they need to be cleaned up first, by correcting them into idiomatic English. (at the very least, convert the Italian use of the present tense for describing past events into the English past tense.) In many cases, this can be more completely done by rewriting on the basis of the original, rather than directly translating and fixing. Our style is plainer than the itWP, and it's usually a good idea to trim down the articles a little.

If you want to work with these translation online here, work in draft space, and fix before submission. You cannot count on somebody rescuing them. The consensus here has been to delete Google translations unless promptly improved. DGG ( talk ) 19:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inaddition, if you are associated with the Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M. ‎ or any other topic you write about, you need to say so on your user page and the article talk page. ``

Leoncillo

Thanks for creating Leoncillo, who obviously should already have had an article here. However, there's a question we need to clear up: it's obvious that you used translation software for at least part of the text. Where were you translating from? If it was it.wp (and I don't see that it was), then we will need to provide attribution under the terms of our CC BY-SA 3.0 licence; I can help you with that. Otherwise we will need to check that it was not from a copyright source, because we don't allow copyright violations here. Please let me know (again, here is fine). Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly I have translated the article myself but I have noticed that many changes have been made to the article not from me, adding some sentences written in a very poor english, and also adding some facts that I am not sure about (ex. Ceramiche Rometti). Could you please check with the other users who have done it?

Yes. My question is this: what source text did you translate? As for the facts you're "not sure about", I added those – you can easily confirm them by looking at the sources I have cited; and, frankly, it doesn't matter whether you are sure about them or not – I am. Thanks for your comment about my English (yes, that needs a capital letter, professoressa!); certainly it could do with some improvement. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you ask where the information I have written comes from, they came from very different sources: Leoncillo's family, book of history of art written by famous university professors, newspaper articles, etc. As for the article on wikipedia I have written, it is the result of 20 years study that I have made on the artist. I want to cooperate but if you are the one who are changing everything I have written please, check on a monograph BOOK of Leoncillo!! And you will find that I am doing for the culture promotion of the artist. Beside adding all his implication with politics doesn't help in art!! For example if you talk about a Futurist artist today and you write that they were linked to fascism you disvalue their work which talks about technology, colors and a new way to paint or to make sculpture.

I'm going to suggest that you stop adding unreferenced content to the Leonardi page; you would not want to reach the point where your presence here comes to be seen as WP:disruptive. If you think that something in the article is wrong, then the place to discuss that is the talk-page, Talk:Leoncillo Leonardi. Of course his politics are important, as they are for any artist who lived through the war - they affected his life and were crucial to the work he did. And yes, Italian Futurism is inextricably bound up in Fascism – the interesting thing, of course, is that Russian Futurism was an expression of Communism. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You erased all the references... But as I told you do whatever you like on the Leoncillo's article.