User talk:Alltheusernamesiwantedwerealreadyinuse

Hello Alltheusernamesiwantedwerealreadyinuse, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. This is not an automated message :) Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in my sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please leave me a message! ShakingSpirit ^talk 15:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the articles

One thing, don't put TONUS PERINGUS or whatever in caps in the title. Just use normal title case. — Timneu22 · talk 12:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The branding for TONUS PEREGRINUS is always full caps - see the website at [1] - not to confuse the ensemble name with "tonus peregrinus" (the Latin chant) or Tonus Peregrinus (an incorrect capitalization of the Latin chant name). Alltheusernamesiwantedwerealreadyinuse

Replaceable fair use File:AntonyPitts2009aPHOTOCREDITMalcolmCrowthers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AntonyPitts2009aPHOTOCREDITMalcolmCrowthers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alpha and Omega (Bizzy Bone album)

The article Alpha and Omega (Bizzy Bone album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not assert the notability of the album, fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJC ^Talk_Contribs 16:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1equalmusic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1equalmusic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1equalmusic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. And Adoil Descended (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1equalmusic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Pitts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1equalmusic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 1equalmusic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]