Jump to content

User talk:Allezzoomzoom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Allezzoomzoom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tim PF (talk) 23:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Max Wrottesley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SL93 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Max Wrottesley for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Wrottesley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Wrottesley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Smögen Whisky (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smögen Whisky (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smögen Whisky (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Allezzoomzoom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Mdann52talk to me! 15:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smögen Whisky

[edit]

Hey! I saw your comment on the Wikiproject Sweden talk page. I edited your draft a bit, removing some and adding some, first and foremost fixing some sources and adding new ones. The added news sources are two major regional newspapers, one large national newspaper, and the state news. Should be notable enough. Stamboliyski (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smögen Whisky has been accepted

[edit]
Smögen Whisky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angels' Nectar (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Angels' Nectar, from its old location at User:Allezzoomzoom/Angels' Nectar. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 15:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angels' Nectar (April 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Angels' Nectar for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angels' Nectar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels' Nectar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HINDWIKICHAT 02:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]