User talk:AlleXyS
Speedy deletion nomination of OFC President's Cup
[edit]Hello AlleXyS,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OFC President's Cup for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fauzan✆ talk ✉ email 15:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Donating copyrighted materials
[edit]Hello AlleXyS,
In your article, OFC President's Cup, you mentioned that you are the owner of plusoccer.com. In order for you to take content from the website, though, you must first prove you are the owner by going through the official copyrighted material donation process. Thanks, Passengerpigeon (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 22:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Passengerpigeon (talk) 22:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Cupa Ligii 2014
[edit]Hi, I'm TheQ Editor. AlleXyS, thanks for creating Cupa Ligii 2014!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider adding some references
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheQ Editor (talk) 21:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Football Rankings
[edit]Hi. Could I ask you to please stop adding football club rankings to pages. Looking at this it seems that you are closely affiliated with the site producing the rankings. More importantly, I cannot find anything that would suggest any particular provenance to the rankings let alone any understanding of how they are calculated. For rankings, we can't simply use some individuals personal calculation method. Any rankings if given, need to come from an official source or a notable independant source. I am not sure that fooballsize.com is such. Fenix down (talk) 14:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- thanks for your message about Football Ranking. So, to be displayed, I need first time to present a 100% explanations, to can be understood by everybody? And then ..... my ranking is unofficial (and probably will remain so, because doesn't exista an official club ranking for clubs - IFFHS is not).... to be displayed on wikipedia, these dates must be added by other ... a neutral part? not by the creator of this ranking?
- thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlleXyS (talk • contribs) 15:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think the main problem is that I can't see anyone, anywhere discussing your ranking system. To be honest, I find it very interesting, especially the number of clubs that are ranked, but since there is no way of understanding how the ranking is calculated, there seems to be little discussion of the rankings by any reliable third party sources, and you, the creator of the ranking system are adding it to WP, it is essentially WP:OR which is expressly forbidden. I would advise you to keep on with it and hopefully others will comment on the rankings and help provide an indication of reliability. Please post any reply on your talk page to keep the thread as one. I will see any changes you make on my watchlist. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 15:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know how I can reply to your message. Maybe edit file and add my message there? How I did already now? If you want to know some details about "How is made", you can find here : http://footballsize.com/explanations/ ! The original ranking is on my computer, but I wanted to publish it on internet .... so wordpress was the most quickly method with some php codes.
- You just did! thanks for the link to the explanations. I still think that the fact that this is your personal methodology means the rankings are still original research. there needs to be discussion and use of the rankings by others to increase their notability before they are readded. Like I said though, they are very interesting to read. Fenix down (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yah .... sorry to spam again, but I need to know ... why this ranking is allowed and mine no? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Al-Faisaly_FC_(Harmah)#Asian_clubs_ranking !!Because use a formula which is used by many sites, but have some "personal" modifications. It's just a question, nothing personal, but I need to know the differences, to can know how increate the notoriety.
- No problem. For football database, I would argue it is because it has been used by independant publications as a source for rankings, for example here. you can't really increase the notability of your own ranking calculation. If other people pick up on it and use it in a similar context as above then that is something that just happens. Fenix down (talk) 16:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- So, if anybody else add dates from my site, is OK. If I add, it's not :D I can tell my friends to post? :)) normally, is not fair... I hope the peoples will find my ranking and the popularity of ranking will grow up
- Not really, it's about the notability of your ranking system. Currently, to my knowledge, it hasn't received any coverage or been used independently of your site, so it is not a notable ranking system so shouldn't really be used on WP. Fenix down (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm first year at Computer Science (University), I hope I can learn aspx and php to create a site only for the ranking :D Then, I think the notoriety can grow up better than on a wordpress site, need a own platform to take attention. thanks for your time and your indications
- No problem, I hope that your ranking system does gain attention, I have long been looking for something that would capture rankings for some of the world's more minor clubs. Fenix down (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm first year at Computer Science (University), I hope I can learn aspx and php to create a site only for the ranking :D Then, I think the notoriety can grow up better than on a wordpress site, need a own platform to take attention. thanks for your time and your indications
- Not really, it's about the notability of your ranking system. Currently, to my knowledge, it hasn't received any coverage or been used independently of your site, so it is not a notable ranking system so shouldn't really be used on WP. Fenix down (talk) 19:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- So, if anybody else add dates from my site, is OK. If I add, it's not :D I can tell my friends to post? :)) normally, is not fair... I hope the peoples will find my ranking and the popularity of ranking will grow up
- No problem. For football database, I would argue it is because it has been used by independant publications as a source for rankings, for example here. you can't really increase the notability of your own ranking calculation. If other people pick up on it and use it in a similar context as above then that is something that just happens. Fenix down (talk) 16:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yah .... sorry to spam again, but I need to know ... why this ranking is allowed and mine no? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Al-Faisaly_FC_(Harmah)#Asian_clubs_ranking !!Because use a formula which is used by many sites, but have some "personal" modifications. It's just a question, nothing personal, but I need to know the differences, to can know how increate the notoriety.
- You just did! thanks for the link to the explanations. I still think that the fact that this is your personal methodology means the rankings are still original research. there needs to be discussion and use of the rankings by others to increase their notability before they are readded. Like I said though, they are very interesting to read. Fenix down (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know how I can reply to your message. Maybe edit file and add my message there? How I did already now? If you want to know some details about "How is made", you can find here : http://footballsize.com/explanations/ ! The original ranking is on my computer, but I wanted to publish it on internet .... so wordpress was the most quickly method with some php codes.
May 2016
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2016–17 UEFA Europa League, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't search for a site which give official news, but I tell you that this is real, and all dates which I given was correct.
- This is completely unsourced and should not be added without confirmation. Qed237 (talk) 18:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- http://www.digisport.ro/Sport/FOTBAL/Competitii/Champions+League/Scenariu+de+vis+pentru+Astra+APOEL+in+turul+trei+preliminar+si+L - look a source here :) is one of the biggest sites of sport in Romania. (Pandurii - Turul 3 al Europa League, şanse mici să fie cap de serie) (Viitorul - Turul 3 al Europa League, nu va fi cap de serie) and (Pentru ultimul loc de cupele europene se vor lupta două formaţii din play-out. CSMS Iaşi şi CSU Craiova au în acest moment cele mai mari şanse.)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Boxing at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's 66 kg, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 13:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)