User talk:AllNipponAirwaysLover

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Monster House (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Monster House (film) was changed by Marlou Arizala (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863546 on 2020-07-25T11:33:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Monster House (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - SUBWAY 03:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rodolfo Acquaviva, you may be blocked from editing. - SUBWAY 03:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Subwaymuncher, stop your absurd reminders. As far as I know, I am not violating such rules nor vandalizing other pages. I am contributing by providing new information. Now let me ask you, do you think those original information you like to retain in the pages also have citations? They don’t. If you can answer me, then I might stop editing. Mind your own business. Marlou Arizala (talk) 11:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Subwaymuncher, I would also like to inform you that you’re already abusing your privilege as well. Just because you’re an extended confirmed user it doesn’t mean you’ll exercise the role of an admin. How can you say that I was vandalizing other pages? What I did was not vandalism. You’re just wrongly accusing me of such because you want me out of Wikipedia. You don’t want me to be here. Marlou Arizala (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marlou Arizala The reason I reverted your edit on Ai-Ai delas Alas is because the source you provided does not contain or support any of the information you added. You added the quote: "I can only do so much. If they want their group to prosper in their career, then I guess they should change themselves first. I can’t help them if they won’t help themselves" but nowhere on the ref did delas Alas said that. You also added that she "relinquished her role" to Bosx1ne where in fact, the ref only says: the “quitting” lasted no longer than 10 minutes. For the other edits you made, like in Monster House, and Rodolfo Acquaviva, you completely added new or changed information without even explaining why. I'm not the only one who reverted your edits. While I appreciate you for adding new information, please make sure that they are true or supported by a reliable source. I previously added links that can help you. Thanks.- SUBWAY 12:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I’m sorry for being carried away earlier. I hope this cleared things out. I was just bothered on how conscious you are to edits. Thanks. Stay safe. Marlou Arizala (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Marlou Arizala, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username.

If you choose to keep your current username, please send an email to info-enwikimedia.org including your real name and your Wikipedia username to receive instructions from our volunteer response team about account verification. Please do not send documentation without being requested to do so.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice,.

Salvio

07:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AllNipponAirwaysLover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

AllNipponAirwaysLover (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

Declining as this now is a checkuser block RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marlou Arizala (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your username is not the only issue here. Nearly all of your edits have violated our verifiability|verifiability and neutral point-of-view policies. In cases where you did supply a reference, the reference did not support the content you added. You'll need to convince us that you understand how those policies work. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock deferred pending discussion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AllNipponAirwaysLover, requesting for unblock clearance. All rules and regulations to be followed. Wilco. New editing approach to be followed as well. Good day. AllNipponAirwaysLover (talk) 06:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've reread the warnings and concerns about sourcing. TBH, I consider misrepresentation of sources a form of vandalism. Not declining the unblock. Merely stating skepticism. Will leave for another reviewing admin to ponder. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. I’d like to inquire the status of the unblocking. Would appreciate if updates would be given soonest. AllNipponAirwaysLover (talk) 06:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I unblock, it never works out. Leaving it for someone who can better assess. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Marlou Arizala to AllNipponAirwaysLover

globally renamed Marlou Arizala to AllNipponAirwaysLover --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Guerillero | Parlez Moi 21:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]