User talk:All.ya.little.triksters
Editing Concerns
[edit]April 2007
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Kukini hablame aqui 22:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit] Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Male contraceptive, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kukini hablame aqui 06:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:69.251.42.198; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esperanza Ortega 01:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to sexual intercourse. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Whether or not you think it's "gay" is not really relevant to the article. Others think the image fits the page section. Thanks. Esseh 06:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Oral contraceptive. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Did you check the Male oral contraceptive article? One method, Adjudin, is in Phase II human trials. Joie de Vivre 04:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Me Gusta!
[edit]I like your name, it's funny!24.218.139.157 01:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)User (Talk): 24.218.139.157
User page
[edit]Please do not edit my user page. If you wish to leave someone a message, the appropriate place is the user Talk page. Thank you. Joie de Vivre 02:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you explain your edits to the above, y'know - the bit where you added Rhinoceros. What was that all about - Alison ☺ 05:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Information_icon.svg/62px-Information_icon.svg.png)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Crank 2, by SkierRMH, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Crank 2 fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Crank 2, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Crank 2 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
[edit]Crank 2 has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might be inappropriate for Wikipedia because it is about something which has not happened yet. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, certainly you don't have to try to keep the article if you don't want. The editor who tagged the article was concerned that your sources weren't reliable enough, which I think is a reasonable concern. Either way. See you around. NickelShoe (Talk) 01:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)