User talk:Aliveworth 123
Appearance
User talk:Aliveworth 123
history of Cobridge
[edit]I see you created the new article Cobridge. However, there are some holes that might need filling, such as correcting the first reference link, which is currently marked as a dead-end link. Wikipedia’s come a long way since it started. So thank you, Jipinghe (talk) 19:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- I just noticed that it seemed to be the only area of Stoke-on-Trent with no Wikipedia page (look how much there is for Sneyd Green which appears to be about the same size as Cobridge, see the size of Cobridge, Sneyd Green). Aliveworth 123 (talk) 08:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I used Reflinks to fill in the refs, but the first ref as you said is still dead. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 08:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wonder if we will ever have an article at Cobridge, Missouri as Cobridge Communications was started, which may meen that there is also a settlement. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 08:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I think that the reason why the first link is dead is because I drafted up the article a few weeks ago. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I wonder if we will ever have an article at Cobridge, Missouri as Cobridge Communications was started, which may meen that there is also a settlement. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 08:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I used Reflinks to fill in the refs, but the first ref as you said is still dead. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 08:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]For creating a decent article on Cobridge.
EchetusXe 11:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thankyou, it was needed. Aliveworth 123 (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)