User talk:AlistairMcMillan/Archive8

iPod / iTunes Connectivity critizism section

In the iPod article, until recently there was a new section within "Critizism" which featured the restrictions Apple is imposing on the newest iPod models so they can't sync with any more with third-party software. You said on 11:27, 16 September 2007 that you edited it out because it was "already mentioned in article" -- but it isn't. You said before at 19:43, 15 September 2007, you reverted "all of today's nonsense", and asked ironically if "Apple deliberately changed the format to screw over all 0.01% of users who use their iPods with Linux???" -- But whats at stake here is no nonsense at all. It affects more than just the (certainly more than 0.01%) people who use iPods with Linux. It is a deliberate move by Apple towards a harsh lock-in strategy on their iTunes line. "This means that customers who purchased the affected iPods can only use the Apple iTunes software to put songs onto their iPod" -- this phrase (which you edited out of earlier versions) is certainly true and certainly no "nonsense". -- Hardy Roede, PM on request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.2.102 (talk • contribs) 13:38, September 16, 2007

-- Just seen that there indeed is a small chunk of information on the subject in the "File storage and transfer" section of the article, but I still think it fits better in the Critizism section, where it can be explained more in detail. I undid some of the editings there. -- Hardy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.174.2.102 (talk • contribs) 14:21, September 16, 2007

Fair use

There are many articles without an infobox image because nobody has found a free alternative. Wasn't there one of Singer at Comic-Con ages ago? Alientraveller 20:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Fact is, we can have the picture, but not in the infobox, if you just want to show his appearance. Fair use needs to illustrate something specific, like his Trek fandom, but there is a free-alternative for his appearance. Alientraveller 20:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

This is how I've had it explained. Don't have an infobox image then if you haven't got a free alternative, and wait for an opportune moment, like a kind editor, or the US government's public domain works. I'm sorry if you don't understand, but remember, fair use policy on Wikipedia doesn't extend to simply showing appearances. Alientraveller 20:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Here are three perfectly clear free use images. Maybe you could use one of these? [1],[2], [3]? Gran² 06:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

GNU/Linux userbox deletion

I've just noticed the GNU/Linux userbox has been deleted and removed from my page. I've just had a scan through the archived discussion to see why. It seems you instigated the deletion, apologies if I am mistaken.

This caused me to think a little about why I had that userbox in the first place. The term "GNU/Linux" is used to describe the combination of GNU software and the Linux kernel, with the suggestion that the combined whole is an "Operating System". Linux is a kernel which is a component of an Operating System (I do not see many people disagreeing with this). "GNU software" is more wide-ranging in terms of designation. "Linux" is commonly used to describe Linux-kernel-based operating systems a whole, which is what has upset the GNU people enough to suggest "GNU/Linux" instead.

As it happens, my OS of choice is Debian, or "Debian GNU/Linux". Faced with my missing GNU/Linux userbox, I have the option of adding a GNU userbox and a Linux one. However, I've come to decide that GNU/Linux is an equally insufficient name for my OS as Linux is, since both are parts that do not sum to the whole. Therefore, I will add neither GNU nor Linux. -- Jon Dowland 19:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Stephen Tweedie

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Stephen Tweedie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Rémy Card

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Rémy Card, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

XYplorer AfD courtesy blanking.

Three things:

1. Please remember our policy of Assuming good faith. Undoing an edit and calling it vandalism, when it has already been explained, is rude, and goes against AGF and WP:CIV.
2. Please inform yourself better. Blanking is not equal to vandalism. Courtesy blanking is fully supported by Jimbo when it could cause hard feelings
3. Given the post on the HD, it obviously hurt to have the deletion up. Thus, a courtesy blanking was suitable.

In the future, please refrain from calling other editors vandals without a very good reason. Civility is important to Wikipedia's survival, blanket accusations do not help us --L^augh! 20:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mike Pinkerton

Mike Pinkerton, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Mike Pinkerton satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Pinkerton and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Mike Pinkerton during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- mms 00:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dave Hyatt

Dave Hyatt, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Dave Hyatt satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Hyatt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Dave Hyatt during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- mms 00:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Asa Dotzler

An article that you have been involved in editing, Asa Dotzler, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asa Dotzler. Thank you. -- mms 01:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Pardon me.

Dear,

This is a public ip, I live in apartment which shared an internet connection. So let me make an apologies for someone who also lived in this building for spamming/vandalising.

Btw I really appreciate what Wikipedia has done in helping other people to learn about many knowledges.

Thanks,

Eliho —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.124.39.83 (talk • contribs) 02:16, August 11, 2007

Typo fixin' - Thanks!

Thanks again. MrZaius^talk 01:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Streamium

Added link to reliable source showing that streamium is a significant precursor to Apple TVbrian stormen 09:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Here is another one talking about Yahoo and the Streamium TV: http://www.theregister.com/2004/01/09/yahoo_and_philips_in_streamium/ brian stormen 10:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice!

I liked the edit summary on WebKit. :-) Maury 23:14, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AM Bryan Singer in Star Trek Nemesis.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AM Bryan Singer in Star Trek Nemesis.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD you commented on - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of portable software (2nd nomination)

Please take another look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of portable software (2nd nomination) when you can? You previously left a comment there. I have vastly edited the article in question, and left comments there on the AfD--you may wish to review the situation again in light of this. Thank you. • Lawrence Cohen 16:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Not Vandalism

Read that article in the link I posted the third paragraph under the picture "Making a new XNA game" it's says "For this tutorial start with the Windows Game project. Once you have selected it you can immediately run the project and see a wonderful cornflower blue, blank screen. (It is widely speculated that cornflower blue is Tom Miller's favorite color)." Also Codng4fun is runed by microsoft so it realible source.--71.170.106.104 22:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Also how is my edit for latin vandalism?--71.170.106.104 22:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Expose comparison to flip 3d

I've rewritten the statements now... instead of removing... Hope it's in a neutral tone.. the previous version was

As with many of the features on Windows Vista, Windows Flip 3D has been singled out as an extremely similar feature to that of Expose.(this statement implicitly means that Vista has copied many of the features of mac which is a POV)

I've rewritten this.. check it Mugunth 05:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Time Machine critique of Leopard

Thanks for the edits on Leopard. I reverted this change, though: it eliminated sourced criticisms of Leopard in the mainstream trade press, as well as a valuable fact (Time Machine backups aren't bootable) which can be sourced further than the Super Duper guy. Super Duper is also very notable; a conflict between the most notable third party backup vendor and Apple is a valuable and interesting item.

On balance I agree with you, but I think the fix is to balance the text of the critique with the counterarguments, not to strip the original critiques out of the article.

--- tqbf 19:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

COI

Real quick: do you see a COI on the factual content about Leopard "Seatbelt" and TinySCHEME? If not, I'm reverting my change back in. If so, I'll ask the RS noticeboard.

Thanks in advance!

--- tqbf 22:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

MacBook (Late2007) Leopard Build

http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2007/11/macbook-performance-november-2007/

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/2295

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/24712

Is it so hard to use google and type: leopard 9a3110? —Preceding unsigned comment added by W4wan (talk • contribs) 08:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Windows CardSpace

I did a bit of link cleaning by basically limiting the links to MS resources and the alternate ISes. So I removed your spammy linky tag. Let me know if you think I should have gone further. --Blowdart | ^talk 08:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

DNS Server "spam"

I don't have a strong opinion about what software is covered on Comparison of DNS server software, but someone else appears to, and reverted your change as "spam by omission" (heh). A diff: [4].

--- tqbf 17:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:NNC clearly states that notability does not apply to content. Would you please quit with the "not notable software" or explain why WP:NNC does not apply? --87.56.149.202 (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Implementions of RDP Servers for Linux

Worldwide there are currently only 2 implementations of this kind. So both should be worth mentioning on the Wikipedia Page about Remote Desktop Protocol and none of both should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgibson99 (talk • contribs) 21:17, November 21, 2007

Your recent edits to Comparison of remote desktop software

Regarding the summary of this edit - "Another that does not have it's own article i.e. is not notable". Notability is unrelated to having or not having a WP article. I assume you just misspoke, because the rationale as it's stated is invalid. Alex Pankratov (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, read some comments on this page. Other editors appear to have raised similar concerns with your edits to DNS Software Comparison article. You did in fact remove few notable entries from the Remote Desktop software article. All in all - lists and comparison tables fall into a gray area of WP policies. What you consider a valid removal reason may not be how other editors interpret the same policy. Therefore, as a courtesy to other editors, please consider first discussing your tentative changes on Talk pages. Especially when it involves a removal of the content, which is considered by many an action of an absolutely last resort. Thanks for reading this, Alex Pankratov (talk) 23:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

The way you had phrased it implied that the lack of notability followed from the lack of article. Moreover, the reverse is often also not a case (due to the article itself being non-notable and a candidate for AfD). Here, see for yourself - LogMeIn vs GoToMyPC. The same goes for CrossLoop, which scores 10 times more hits than Remote Graphics Software. My point is that a cleanup based on a formal criteria, without considering a context or a background, is quite often overly destructive as it trims useful content. Therefore it does not hurt to talk about it first. Removing the content is easy, restoring it - is not. Alex Pankratov (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Redlinks vs. external links vs. plaintext

Sorry you're being forced to spend time on the DNS article.

I have a guideline-y question: you've redlinked the NN DNS servers in the article. Dns9900 wants them externally linked. I don't like either approach, because I don't like the idea of baiting people into creating pages for marginally notable software. Is there a problem with simply not linking stuff?

--- tqbf 22:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Submitted for your consideration: we will not like the outcome of baiting people into writing articles about these products. Many of them are marginally notable at best, but shipped by companies with 2-3 trade press stories. My (brief) experience with the AfD log tells me they'd survive AfD: how do AfD voters judge a real story from one planted by PR? So now we have 10 new WP articles, all hard to delete, all magnets for COI edits and POV disputes (we already had a nasty one between MaraDNS and Djbdns, and they're OSS!). I propose we simply de-link things that aren't notable enough to have articles, and settle the WP:NNC arguments on a case-by-case basis. But I'll concede you're the authority here and follow your lead. --- tqbf 23:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, following your lead. Also, didn't mean to convey that Sam was causing problems; I think that situation has resolved itself. --- tqbf 00:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Classification of admins

Hi AlistairMcMillan. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee t/c 22:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Reversion on Ron Moore page

Just wondering what was inappropriate about the addition I'd made to Mr. Moore's page...I'm newish here, and finding some of these decisions difficult to understand -- help me know how I went wrong? Thanks! Clg0107 15:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

What experience did you have with Banyan VINES?

Just curious. I was a VINES engineer in the US Marine Corps and also in private industry. Saw some of your edits on the Banyan article. What a sad story! I expanded the other Banyan-related article at Banyan VINES. Cao! SimonATL (talk) 04:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Timeline of iMac models

Could you help with the Template:Timeline of iMac models? It's a bit of a edit/revert war with the other person not really trying to reason or counter my points as to why his edits are improper. I think we need the point where an admin (or someone else) is needed to pass judgement on this (no response from WikiProject Macintosh isn't helping). Thanks Butterfly0fdoom (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

About WP:COI and MaraDNS

Here me out: I'm frustrated with the discussion in MaraDNS. Look at the talk page. Read it from top to bottom. Here is what you will observe:

• In 2005 I had the exact same concerns that you had about editing the article. So I got permission on the talk page to edit the article.

• In 2007, there was son controversey about some of my edits, so people brought out WP:COI. Why wasn't this is problem in 2005? Why is this a problem in 2007?

Let me give you a silly example of an argument in that particular pissing contest: Someone pointed out that MaraDNS was not notable because the Wikipedia page is the second Google hit. Well, that makes BIND non-notable, because if you do an Google search for BIND, the second Google hit is, well, the Wikipedia BIND article (which I also contributed to, mainly because I don't think it's fair that DjbDNS has a much bigger article). So, yeah, it became a pissing contest, and it got a little ugly. So I stepped back and decided to make MaraDNS a better DNS server instead of wasting my time in the Wikipedia for a couple of months.

And, yes, I had COI concerns in 2005. I still have those concerns in 2007, which is why I'm not editing that article.

Now, let me tell you why Wikipedia sucks. It sucks because there are just too many pissing contests here. People--not just me--but many people are disgusted with the community at Wikipedia. Cite Cite2. Now, I think it is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness. I think the solution is to have a less open process. For example, with MaraDNS, while I accept many patches from many sources, I am the ultimate arbitrator of what gets in to the code (so we don't get silly things like the RA bit set in the non-recursive build of MaraDNS, just to give an example of a patch I made today). I think there should be a software development style process, where "stable" versions of pages can only be edited by admins, but any user can edit the "CVS" version of an article, which won't become the main article until it goes through some review process.

Maybe even have a "CVS section" that will have a zillion little artcles about trivial things, like MaraDNS, like Secession (band), like Empire of Atlantium, and so on. There should by no VFD allowed for these articles; but there can be a lot of debate about what articles become "stable" Wikipedia articles. This way, instead of people getting upset because, say, their Webcomic was deleted, we can say "Of course we have a page about it in the CVS wikipedia. Good luck getting it in mainline".

I think Wikipedia is too big for just any user to be able to edit just any page. I also don't think VFD serves any real purpose, nor do "But it's not notable enough" flame wars.

Anyway, MaraDNS is getting better. I'm finally rewriting the recursive code, and should have something ready for general consumption next year sometime (I already have some code that would be very useful in, say, a WiFi router). I have also gotten private emails about people who want to write about MaraDNS in their book; I will let you know when that is published.

Now, when the new code is written, I don't think it will be particularily fair to users to read outdated information on the Wikipedia. Which is why I'm asking you to make contributions to the article when MaraDNS gets updated. Don't just bully other editors around. Contribute. Make Wikipedia a better place. Samboy (talk) 22:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Request

Can you restore the article Wikipedia:Parodies/Inciclopedia in my discussion? I'm an user from other wiki, thanks.--201.246.46.23 (talk) 23:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Apple Bias

Please stop threatening me with permanent blocking just because I apparently insulted you. I contacted an administrator and they are investigating the privileges you are claiming to be able to use. Last time I checked, you cannot get banned from editing because you disagree with someone on the talk page of a product.

I look at your history of edits and much of it has to do with removing criticism from Apple. I did not mean to insult you but to refute your bias. Maybe I have an anti-Apple bias, but I own four of their products. Essentially, I don't want to turn this into a personal issue, so please stop threatening my account with admin priviledges you don't have.

Regards, Chrisjustinparr (talk) 22:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Well to be fair, it wasn't a forum post. I've seen people use Macrumours.com articles before as sources at Wikipedia. Furthermore, the Wikipedia reference I used has more than 60 references and to include them all would be overwhelming. I didn't realize we couldn't use Wikipedia articles for reference, so I added some direct links to iTunes and Apple TV version history from their website.Chrisjustinparr (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Well if I can get blocked for the three revert rule, so can you :) Chrisjustinparr (talk) 22:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I found the article. http://www.tuaw.com/2007/12/28/apple-tv-on-yahoo-techs-worst-of-2007-list/ Take a look. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisjustinparr (talk • contribs) 22:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping it and redirecting to the Yahoo article. Sorry for misunderstanding buddy. Oh and the above comment was mine.Chrisjustinparr (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Goldmember

An article that you have been involved in editing, Goldmember, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmember. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AM Exposé all.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AM Exposé all.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Am wmp for mac.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Am wmp for mac.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:AM Exposé application.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:AM Exposé application.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)