User talk:Alison/Archive 52
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Alison. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 | Archive 53 | Archive 54 | Archive 55 |
important question
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 02:39, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- If you don't want me to tell you them, that's fine. I'll just go and ask someone else then. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 17:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Please do. I'm really busy & not really here these days - Alison ❤ 05:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Ding! (twice a few days ago)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— at any time by removing the Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
SlimVirgin, Poetlister
Discussion here: [1] Mindbunny (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
BUSYYYYY
Sorry everyone - I'm way too busy in RL right now to have much time on-line, least of all for WP stuff. Any messages posted here, unless related to Oversight, will likely go ignored. Really sorry but I'm just too busy with bill-paying kinda work - Alison ❤ 23:22, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Obvious IP sock
look at this.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- No, it's just a certain imageboard. I protected your user talk. --Bsadowski1 05:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) LOL - /b/tards. Just ignore - Alison ❤ 05:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
User:ABrownG
Thanks. I was thinking I should do that now but you beat me to it. I've blocked him until he agrees to start discussing some of the problems. Hopefully he'll see sense and can be a constructive editor. I don't need to be consulted about any unblock, maybe I should put that on his talk page. Dougweller (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Terri Schiavo case
Hi Alison, I'm confused as to why you made this reversion. Thanks! NYyankees51 (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Those edits were made by a banned editor who is obsessed with the Schiavo case. The IP, an open proxy, is now blocked - Alison ❤ 19:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Peter Rowell
Hello!
Just to let you know I Rev/Del'd those revisions to Peter Rowell again. Not wanting to start a wheel war or anything but when I checked back on Google it became clear that the editor had just copied and pasted from various newspapers. So I Rev/Del'd them as a copyright violation, feel free to undo them if you disagree. To be honest, kinda feel sorry for Peter Rowell, doesn't sound like he's had a very good 2011 so far :(. Hope you're well :)--5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there. Yeah, I'm good with that. If they're copyvios, then they need to go. And yeah - BLPs suck :/ - Alison ❤ 22:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well Courcelles has protected it now anyway. I wasn't going to at the moment as only one editor was adding the unreferenced stuff but I reckon it's probably for the best, I just checked his name on Twitter and he's getting called all sorts on there :/--5 albert square (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
AN discussion
You may be interested in this AN discussion. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Editing a protected page
Banned user ItsLassieTime
Loose ends = Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon = can this be closed? Can the article page Everything Tastes Better with Bacon be semi-protected for at least one month, as it has been disrupted by 2 different socks of the banned user? — Cirt (talk) 08:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Cirt. Yes, that's Confirmed. I've G5'd that AfD and reverted the offending edits. Right now, it's probably a bit early for a prot, but if it happens again, then it might be appropriate. Oh, and two accounts blocked - Alison ❤ 08:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I noted it at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime. Will defer to your judgment about the prot. Thanks so much for your actions! — Cirt (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep an eye on the article? — Cirt (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sure! :) - Alison ❤ 08:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Sure! :) - Alison ❤ 08:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep an eye on the article? — Cirt (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I noted it at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime. Will defer to your judgment about the prot. Thanks so much for your actions! — Cirt (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
re User:TheKohser userpage
"...why not?" Well, perhaps because it is protected and you are supposed to get consensus for potentially controversial edits? Since this is an ArbCom block, any changes should really need to go through them. I have reverted to the status quo, as at the point when I protected this page from the compulsive edit warring that was occuring. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you please help me and remove the "speedy deletion tag" from article?
Hey! How are you, Alison? I need your help, can you please remove the "speedy deletion tag" from the Polyneon (artist) article? Thank you! Jamesallen2 (talk) 09:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there. I've replied on your talk page and have moved your article to somewhere you can rescue your work/improve on it - Alison ❤ 09:58, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Alison for responding! But if you don't mind, can you personally tell me how can I make the article better for approval, so it will never be "speedy deleted"? To me the article is properly sourced, referenced, and etc. Jamesallen2 (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Can I get back to you in the morning? It's 3am here and I need to sleep :) Your article will be fine in your userspace for a good while - don't worry! - Alison ❤ 10:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Alison for responding! But if you don't mind, can you personally tell me how can I make the article better for approval, so it will never be "speedy deleted"? To me the article is properly sourced, referenced, and etc. Jamesallen2 (talk) 10:04, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Ok, Thanks! Jamesallen2 (talk) 10:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Good Morning Alison! Please let me know if this article is ready to be put live on Wikipedia! I have added some more references and etc! Thank you! http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Jamesallen2/Polyneon_(artist)
Non-Free rationale for File:Juggler.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Juggler.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.
If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
many thanks
Thanks for fixing my page Alison. Muchos kudos :) User:Charles evesson - June 26, 2011.
Socks!
- Hi Alison, sorry for the attention grabbing title... I just tagged User:Inetpuppy as an obvious sock of User:Inetpup who was BANNED for operating a large sockfarm but I can't find the SPI for it, any help would be appreciated. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 07:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)