User talk:Alisha.4m
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Alisha.4m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I see you have been changing links in numerous articles to point to KDE Software Compilation 4 instead of KDE. I am curious about your rationale for doing this, as the generic KDE article seems to me to be a more appropriate article to link to in many of these articles. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 12:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC).
ok!
Alisha.4m (talk) 03:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Reliable sourcing
[edit]Please note that blogs are not considered to be reliable sources on Wikipedia. Yworo (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Chakra GNU/Linux for deletion
[edit]
A discussion has begun about whether the article Chakra GNU/Linux, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakra GNU/Linux until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yworo (talk) 03:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- You've written the Chakra article and don't even oppose its deletion. Why's that? --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
The article KDE System Settings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software component. Wikipedia is not a user manual.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 14:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Lokalize has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't appear to have any credible reliable sources. No sign of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FiendYT ★ 14:17, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Aaron Seigo for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Seigo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Seigo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Kdemultimedia for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kdemultimedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kdemultimedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QtRuby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.