User talk:Alidas147

Welcome!

Hello, Alidas147, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Tunbridge Wells Grammar School for Boys page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ali Virani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ali Virani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Xender Lourdes (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Virani (surname), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Xender Lourdes (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 13:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making threats of violence against other editors, at Talk:Michael Henry Nazim. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your entire contributions here appear to be replete with childish mucking around, so you'd be very likely to be blocked even without your silly threats. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alidas147 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Mr.Zebedee, you seem to have misunderstood my friendly advice. I was only looking out for your best interest in safety from Mike, not me, and i do not believe a so called "physical threat" was made towards your self, Mr.Zebe. i was merely sharing a personal anecdote that you foolishly misinterpreted as an attack to your physical health. i can only wish that your wellbeing is not compromised as a result of any actual threats made from OTHERS, but after you made the grave mistake of blocking me indefinitely, i cannot guarantee that it wont be. i hope you can understand that the apparent "threat" made by me was not intentional and it wont be repeated. If you do however, despite my reassurance, still feel threatened, please feel free to visit sunlife over 50s cover for professional reassurance; my former colleagues and especially adversaries found it to be of great use. Again i repeat that if i am unblocked, my misinterpreted actions will not be repeated and we can all enjoy a long, happy life. Thank you."

Decline reason:

It's a nice privilege of editing Wikipedia you have here. Would be a shame if something happened to it... Ooops, now it's broken. How could that happen? So sorry... Talk page access revoked. WP:UTRS is still available to you. Huon (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.