User talk:AliceAlice

Welcome!

Hello, AliceAlice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Flat Out let's discuss it 22:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Flat Out. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kim Yuna without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Flat Out let's discuss it 22:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Yuna Kim does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! TJRC (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC) TJRC (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yuna

Why are you reverting edits without reason? You've already done it twice and you're about to break the 3RR rule. Don't do it again without specific reason, please. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Kim Yuna, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 03:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Your recent editing history at Kim Yuna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AliceAlice reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been blocked twice for edit warring on this article. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AliceAlice reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Kim Yuna

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at WP:AN3 (permalink). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]