User talk:Alibadawi

Syria[edit]

Welcome to wikipedia!

Have you ever been to Syria?

Guy Montag 03:05, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kaafirphobia[edit]

Hi. The removal of kaafirphobia has been agreed by two admins. Please do not add it again. __earth

Hi Earth! So, only two admins 'agreed' but not a two-thirds majority? Also, you have not named them either here or in Kafir Talk Page. In that case, I feel this term ought to be there. You are invited to discuss this here or on the Kafir Talk Page but please do not remove it as there is evidence of 31 hits from Google. This implies it is notable. Alibadawi 04:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you actually read the talk page and check the history page, you'll realize of whom I'm talking about. (user:Dbachmann and user:Shem Daimwood). Also read Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Kaafirphobia. More over, if you actually check the search, many of it are repeating search and in the end referred back to Wikipedia's page. Again, pelase read the talk page thoroughly. __earth 04:57, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

So, Dbachmann is an admin but anyway, let my quote what he said to you, Earth:

>I really don't see why the term needs to be suppressed,

>seeing that this article is still very short and badly

>in need of more material. That's just my opinion, of

>course, and I'll gracefully yield to community

>consensus :) dab (ᛏ) 09:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

And you, Earth replied to Dbachmann:

>Alright then, but could we just remove the reference to

>the two sociologists? I'm convinced they are fake since

>the university's dean itself, according to a blog,

>doesn't recognize them. __earth 09:20, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

So, I take it that if 'we just remove the reference to the

two sociologists' the Kaafirphobia section can be retained,

right?

Feel free to give me your feedback to what I said so it may

yield community consensus. Thank you. Alibadawi 05:10, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see, sorry, I didn't realize we have Colin chee (talk • contribs) adding his own neologism,

and playing games on geocities and blogs; I suppose he'll have to provide better references then,
 like mention of the term on the "Social Centre on Racism and Xenophobia" website, which have
  adopted the term according to his claim. dab (ᛏ) 09:26, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

He added that after realizing it violates Wikipedia's not original reseach policy. Moreover, when I said reference, it includes removing the source, not merely the "sociologists" names. (i.e. that geocities site which is constructed by the same user that added the term in the first place) __earth 05:22, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

I am not sure of your claim that 'he added that after realizing it violates Wikipedia's not original reseach policy'. That aside, if I remove the source (ie. Geocities web site) do you agree to retaining it? The term as I see it is a useful term describing radical Islamists and moreover a Google will show numerous web sites other than Wikipedia have this term. So, adding it to Kaafir article will not constitute original research. Alibadawi 05:36, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not anymore. It obvious the term is of relatively new invention by some fake sociologists of no significance. My suspicion that there is socketpuppetry involved also strengthens my stand. And no, most of Google searches link back to Wikipedia (most of the searches are blogs). That means all those blogs quote Wikipedia. If we use those blogs to justify this term, we are commiting logical fallacy (circular reasoning). In any case, an admin has overruled you and please, no more revert. Please read the talk page next time before editing.__earth 05:41, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Why 'not anymore' ? Also, you cannot call someone fake or allerge socketpuppetry is involved without evidence as this will be a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please provide the evidence of your claims. The onus is on you not me. The reason why I stand for inclusion because nationmaster includes entry on Kaafirphobic, which is totally different from Wikipedia. So, I await you to prove to me your claims. Thanks. Alibadawi 05:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I said I suspect of socketpuppetry, just like what happened at the earlier vfd. I didn't accuse you of anything, yet. And you said nationmaster includes it for an entire different reason? You must be kidding. If so, why the entry is totally similar to Wikipedia's deleted version? Are you an admin of nationmaster? If you are, then send wikipedia an genuine email along with its header. If you are not, don't make false claim like what Colin Chee is doing. __earth 06:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Your claim that the earlier vfd had socketpuppetry is not true otherwise nationmaster would not include the entry Kaafirphobia. What is deleted on Wikipedia cannot be compared, and no, I am not an admin at nationmaster but I just mentioned nationmaster article is different from Wikipedia, which means it can be used as reference. Alibadawi 06:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Look up the term Mirror (computing) if you are unfamiliar with it. Well, since the issue is being brought up to sysop, I hope this disagreement will end soon. __earth 06:27, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

3 Revert rule[edit]

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. Mark ¹ 07:34, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree with you that nobody should break the three revert rule because breaking the rule means anarchy in Wikipedia. Garywbush 04:40, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A proof of sockpuppetry? Check this history . why did you say that gary?__earth 10:11, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Userpage grammar fix[edit]

Thanks for fixing the grammar error on my userpage! Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 16:27, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Private Messages[edit]

You may freely use this space for your private messages to me. Give me your feedback, positive or negative or neutral. However, please be advised that I do not reply to trolls. Alibadawi 05:41, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

=Request for Comment[edit]

Please be aware that I have made a request for comment about your relationship with User:Garywbush. If you want to defend yourself, please go to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Garywbush Robdurbar 13:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]