User talk:Alialigalig

Chabba Cheema moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chabba Cheema, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) plases read this section WP:GEOLAND, which explain that Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low.Muhammad Ali Butt (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, feel free to add your articles to this! † Encyclopædius 21:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maryam Abad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maryam Abad, is not ready for mainspace. You appear to have googled ‘Maryam Abad’ and added links to anything you found, including places in a completely different country. Please check your references carefully and only include those that refer to this specific place. I have moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: According to Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) please read this section WP:GEOLAND, which explain that Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. The second point that I want to highlight is that number of Wikipedia Reviewers, review my published pages, they should highlight this problem when they review these pages which mentioned by you.Muhammad Ali Butt (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: I am surprised by these surprises, my 18 pages are marked as reviewed by different reviewers including you, hopefully, every reviewer well aware about the Wikipedia General notability guideline that's why they own reviewer rights and review pages. If I was unaware about General notability guideline all of them should notify me about it when they were reviewing my pages, but no one, because of my right participation on Wikipedia. You suddenly marked more than 8 mine pages as non-notable and move them to draftspace just because of one or two wrong references on them. There was a number of options available by which these wrong references can be fixed, but you don't use those option which looked confirmed attack. Muhammad Ali Butt (talk) 23:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pathanke Cheema, Shair Pur, Ajitke Chattha pages are reviewed by @Mcampany:
Pindori Khurd page is reviewed by @Mccapra:
Draft:Bega Kalan reviewed by @Fitindia:
Chabba Cheema reviewed by @North8000:
Hassan Wali reviewed by @Arthistorian1977:
Ghari Donger, Gurali (Pakistan), Gill Wala, Kale Wala, Jamke Chattha, Bara Pind (Pakistan), Bega Khurd, Kot Asaish, Pindori Kalan, Dharam Kot pages are reviewed by @Hughesdarren:
Jugna Chattha is reviewed by @John B123:

~~Read what I’ve said to you again. I have not moved these articles to draft space because they failed to pass GNG, and I did not mark them as not notable.~~ If the topics were not notable I would have marked them for deletion, not sent them to draft space. I sent them to draftspace because the topics are indeed notable and there should be articles about them on Wikipedia, just not the ones you have written. This is not about notability, it is about what is acceptable editing on Wikipedia, and what is not. The fact that a topic is notable does not give you a licence to freely invent whatever you like about it, or to fill articles you create with junk references to places in a Iran, Ethiopia and elsewhere, or to cite sources that have nothing to do with the claims made.

If other reviewers didn’t notice what you were doing that’s too bad, but I have noticed. I have read every article you’ve created and your editing has got worse by the day. The earlier articles you created about places in Pakistan were simple stubs and they were fine. I have left them alone. Then you began to write longer articles, each one claiming a % of each village to be Muslim or of other religions. There isn’t a single source for any of these statements in any of these articles so as far as I can see you just made them up. Where your articles included unsourced claims I have removed the claims and left the rest of the article alone. The only articles I have moved to draft space are the ones where you have inserted phoney references that do not support the claims made in the article text.

I could simply have removed these refs and the accompanying text, but why should I? Why should you continue to produce misleading rubbish and rely on other editors to clean up after you to make sure they are fit for an encyclopedia? You can clean up your own messes and take responsibility for what you’ve added yourself. Once the junk references and unsourced claims are removed from the articles they can go back into mainspace. You cannot go on editing in this fashion so if you want to continue you need to take a completely different approach and use appropriate and relevant sources with care. Mccapra (talk) 02:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A further note from me. First, on rereading my earlier comments I see a number of typing mistakes which must have made my comments hard to follow in some places, so I apologise for that. I’ve now tidied them up. Secondly, I now understand your query about GNG. The tool I use to move articles to draftspace auto generates a text that talks about moving an article back to mainspace when you think it passes GNG. Actually I should have removed that text before it posted to your talk page because it’s not relevant in these cases. So apologies again for confusing you with that. However the reason for moving them is as I’ve set out above - your use of references. Mccapra (talk) 03:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was noted above as having reviewed one of the articles. This was done under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process. Regarding notability I followed the accepted practice that notability is presumed for inhabited towns. Most of these new small town articles are stubs and I treated it as such. So my review does not mean that there are no issues with the article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 12:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Today I have reviewed another article you created, Jham Wala. In this article too you have simply google searched the term and dumped links in, pretending that they support what you’ve written in the article. Stop it. I see you have created a whole list of articles about places in Pakistan and I’m now moving them all into draft space. You can’t expect to waste other editors’ time clearing up your messes. If you want them back in mainspace then please check through them and remove any junk references you’ve added. I will be watching for any articles you post to mainspace from now on, and if I find any more like this I will report you. If you are not sure how to manage sourcing properly please use the Articles for Creation process. Mccapra (talk) 09:50, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhalla Chattha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dhalla Chattha, contains references to sources that do not support the article content. I have left a warning in your talk page. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verpal Chattha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Verpal Chattha, contains references to sources that do not support the article content. I have left a warning in your talk page. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jham Wala moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jham Wala, contains references to sources that do not support the article content. I have left a warning in your talk page. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 09:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iftikhar Nagar Cheema moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iftikhar Nagar Cheema, contains references to sources that do not support the article content. I have left a warning in your talk page. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saide Wali moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saide Wali, contains references to sources that do not support the article content. I have left a warning in your talk page. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:13, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kub Pora Cheema moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kub Pora Cheema, has no sources and you have a record of creating articles that are not properly supported. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohlunke moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mohlunke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kaka Kolo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaka Kolo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jamke Chattha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jamke Chattha, contains sources that do not support the statements made in the article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kot Asaish moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kot Asaish, contains a number of sources that do not support the statements made in the article. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:03, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bega Kalan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bega Kalan, contains misleading references. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Hamza3132 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alialigalig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not connected in any way with the Hamza3132 and other mentioned in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamza3132. I am staying in a living hotel from last five days for an assignment and using Public Wifi that is provided by the hotel. A number of people are using the same Public Wifi. So, I want to request review this block.

Decline reason:

So either everyone in that hotel just happens to have an interest in noodle entrepreneur Damien Lee, or you are not being truthful. I'm going with the latter. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ohnoitsjamie: Please have to look at my contributions I don't have any idea about noodle entrepreneur Damien Lee, my interest is about Villages, towns, and cities of Pakistan. I publish almost 25 Pages and every page is about Small Villages of Pakistan. The only similarity that found between Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamza3132 and me is IP Address. Not a single edit is common.Muhammad Ali Butt (talk) 22:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maryam Abad has been accepted

Maryam Abad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maryam Abad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Maryam Abad, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dhalla Chattha

Hello, Alialigalig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dhalla Chattha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.