User talk:Algoritam1

Airport sources

Every connection must be sourced with independent sources. Therefore the websites of the airline or airport are not suitable sources. I have reverted your edits that did replace independent sources by the airline website. I have also restored the sources you have removed earlier.The Banner talk 09:12, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find it quite DISTURBING that you are:

- removing current links (I've updated the page with relevant links)

- adding "independent" links which funnily enough come from 1 (one) web site only!?

- consider a 3rd party web site to have more relevant information than the airline company itself.

I am shocked, and honestly, quite disturbed by this fact. Algoritam1 (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in any way related to Air Serbia or Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport? And please read WP:V and WP:RS. The Banner talk 16:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you VANDALIZING the Belgrade Nikola Tesla page?

Why are you ADDING IRRELEVANT links to this page?

Are you making MONEY from the website whose links you are adding to the page? Algoritam1 (talk) 06:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you are the one with a Conflict of interest.

And what you call vandalising, is in fact just upholding WP:V and WP:RS to make Wikipedia reliable and verifiable. The Banner talk 08:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 12:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pls stop with your DISRUPTIVE behavior.

An official link is VERY RELEVANT. A random source that you are displaying makes me wonder if you have any interest other than the benefit of the Wikipedia community. Algoritam1 (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The disruptive behaviour is coming from your side, my friend. Please read WP:V and WP:RS. The Banner talk 16:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links

Enough said. Algoritam1 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just do your homework. With your link you make clear that you do not understand what you are doing here. The Banner talk 16:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jz0610 (talk) 18:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please read WP:V and WP:RS. The Banner talk 08:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you have seen on your own Talk page - you have been warned not to do these edits again, as you were WRONG.

If you continue publishing IRRELEVANT links from a Blog, I will REPORT you.

Thank you for not going AGAINST Wikipedia policies again. Algoritam1 (talk) 12:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun with that but be aware of the boomerang. The Banner talk 13:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]