User talk:Alexwright
Welcome!
Hello, Alexwright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —ShadowHalo 19:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Unistd.h, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rocksanddirt (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:TWK Drink.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TWK Drink.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Citation style
[edit]I have a few issues with your citation style. It refuses to use the actual titles of works, which then lead to invented titles that could be constituted as an original synthesis of their contents, which are never allowed on Wikipedia. They also require access dates, to ensure that the content is being cited as of a specific time period (as the cited page may change). ViperSnake151 Talk 03:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Cool cool, I imagine in the cases you're thinking of I was trying to make the citation descriptive, perhaps in the absence of a really obvious title (the url is the title isn't it (!) ). I suspect I may be too used to writing commit message.
I'll try to include cite-dates and archive copies from the wayback machine and use more neutral titles in the absence of a clearly defined title. That said, people who are influenced by the bias found in titles names in footnotes are trying very hard indeed: when I look at a reference it is to read the reference rather than it's title... but yes, standards and consistency and all that jazz. (Alex Wright (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for October 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Medical terminology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morphology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)