User talk:Alexdltb

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sarah Brightman. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sarah Brightman Press Photo 2012.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Brightman Press Photo 2012.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Levo League has been accepted

Levo League, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Mia Farrow page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Alex: I have learned of the efforts of Sunshine Sachs to sell Wikipedia services to its clients, and editing their biographies without the kind of disclosure explicitly required in Wikipedia's Terms of Use since 2014 (and considered industry best practice for much longer). I have published a blog post here: [1] I request that you immediately publish a clear statement of your professional affiliation on your user page, and also on the talk pages of the various articles you have edited; please urge your colleagues at Sunshine Sachs to do so as well, on their various user account pages. -Pete (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello-I noticed the commotion about your paid-editing. Although you have a notice on your user page--as a reader and editor, JFTR, I'd like to see ALL paid edits notated in the edit-summary, maybe with a subscript (p)--or maybe even in article-space itself to be absolutely transparent to readers. 2601:80:4202:203B:690C:F665:1BD2:6A08 (talk) 11:49, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COI disclosure

Hi Alexdltb, please can you complete your COI disclosure per instructions at WP:DISCLOSE. Thanks, Widefox; talk 09:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need suggestion regarding my page Anuja Kapur

My page named as Anuja Kapur has been deleted. I'm sharing the sandbox URL here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Anuja_kapur001/sandbox please have a look on it & help me to improve it. Give your suggestions regarding this problem.Anuja Kapur 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuja kapur001 (talk • contribs)