User talk:AlexLevyOne

Administrators' noticeboard again

This is to inform you that you are the subject of a thread at WP:ANI#AlexLevyOne redux. Deor (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 1 fortnight from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 14:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Le bal des actrices

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Le bal des actrices, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pardonnez-moi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pardonnez-moi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich

I have nominated One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Le bal des actrices

I have nominated Le bal des actrices, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le bal des actrices. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pardonnez-moi

I have nominated Pardonnez-moi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pardonnez-moi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:AlexLevyOne, you will be blocked from editing. Whilst blocked, you are permitted to edit your talk page ONLY to request unblocking, and must NOT remove block templates Mayalld (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:AlexLevyOne, you will be blocked from editing. As you have already been told, you are allowed access to your user page whilst blocked ONLY in order to appeal that block. You must not remove the block template whilst you remain blocked Mayalld (talk) 10:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rather obvious sockpuppet, User:AlexandreLevy, has been indefinitely blocked. Please note that block evasion will likely have repercussions on this account. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mayalld (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. JohnInDC (talk) 00:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Cirt (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. JohnInDC (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(4th). Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(5th). Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 20:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mayalld (talk) 15:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN notification

This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive182#Requesting siteban regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Deor (talk) 04:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlexLevyOne for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mayalld (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello AlexLevyOne! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Benjamin Steinbruch - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reg Traviss

The article Reg Traviss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication that this person is independently notable, does not inherit notability from Winehouse

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.. I can't see if you have talkpage write access blocked, so just popping a note here.--Shirt58 (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]