User talk:Alecmconroy
THIS USER IS: BURNOUT VICTIM It's been a great decade, but it's time to go. Or at least, time to hibernate. I've done all I can here.
The Inevitable EnWP Burnout...
- Acute Causes
- The May 2010 image deletions really shook my confidence in some leaders.
- The lack of engagement and discussion in June 2011 elections shook my faith in the global movement.
- The admission from a 'trusted insider' that my communications are ineffective and largely ignored shook my faith in my ability to productively improve the large-scale movement.
- A dispute about deletion of fair use material shook my faith in our project's ability to embrace 'openness' to the extent needed.
- Chronic Causes
- Any deletion of good-faith contributions is demoralizing and a little 'un-wiki'.
- Instruction creep and an increase in 'because we said so' logic
- In content disputes, the best revision doesn't win-- the most passionate faction's revision wins. Quality doesn't always improve over time.
- Substantial edits involve Too much 'BS' time (edit disputes, etc) not enough 'authoring' time.
- Insight and Predictions
- Radical innovation is required to solve these problems.
- WMF doesn't innovate rapidly or well.
- Non-WMF services will outpace our own projects.
- The cutting edge be distributed-wikis or cloud-wikis.
- WMF will be forced to play technological 'catch up' for the foreseeable futurs.
- Positions
I continue to strongly support the Wikimedia Foundation, the Wiki Movement, and EnWP and wish the organizations the best. I will continue to support their values in the future. Wikimedia is a good thing, worthy of our support. But the stress has outstripped the payoff-- money and code I'll donate-- donating large chucks of time just isn't worth the hassles.
On Burnout
[edit]- Last nail of EnWP
- I uploaded a couple images. They're "free content" as I use the term. Their distribution is 100% legal already, but especially under fair use.
- The images were later deleted. This was a highly demoralizing event.
- Similar "demoralizing deletions' were already under heated discussion. I added my comments.
- My words were met with personal attacks, bogus block threats, and outright lies from deleters.
- A small cadre of like-minded users endorsed these anti-social comments or even joined in the attacks.
- Ramifications
- I have concluded that with EnWp's growth & age have produced a semi-dysfunctional, unpredictable, and highly hostile editing environment.
- I can no longer predict whether a good-faith contribution will be welcomed or merely deleted.
- No one can donate substantial time to a project that may not even value the contribution.
- Bye
- I won't be missed. I write more code than content. Mature projects need gnomes, and I'm not a gnome.
- "I'm getting too old for this shit" When people get to my age, they don't edit WP, they publish signed articles and books. At some point, people just want to write, they don't want to have fight for the chance. Edit wars are a game for the young, and I haven't been young for a long time.
- I still support the project, the movement, and the foundation. I will continue to donate my code and my currency to support this effort-- but donating time to EnWP is no longer a good use of time for me.
- Rationale
- If you burnout after 8 years, you owe people an explaination so they can learn from you. So, learn what you will.
other
[edit]- This user was known as alecmconrory during activity period 2-aug-06 - 2-aug-11
- This user name has (or will be) been scrambled to a random string to signify it's 'out of use'.
- Thus user has been (or will be) indefinitely blocked at their own request.
The last last word
[edit]Requested an indef block, request denied. I could 'earn' one, I suppose, but I'll enact my own.
My old email address is now disabled. Passwords to it and this account have been set to randomly generated strings that I remained blind to. This creates a de facto indefinite ban.
With my last edit, I'd request you 'vanish' me to the extent that seems reasonable. User:Alecmconroy is now a misnomer, as I am no longer a user.
Closed
[edit]- This talk page is no longer monitored.
This page is a very useful page in highlighting the problems WP:RFA and adminship in general face. I've boldly removed the speedy tag from it, and also requested undeletion of the images that were used on it. I hope you will see through to not contesting this. Regardless of the problems of late, that page is very, very good. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
<3
[edit]A cookie for you, wherever you are. Thanks for the light you brought to the projects. – SJ + 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:ColorPhi.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:ColorPhi2.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your loyal dissent
[edit]I know you are long-gone and probably not monitoring this talk page anymore, but just in case you are, I want to thank you for Wikipedia:Dissent is not disloyalty. As you can see, the essay has grown and improved over the years despite some initial resistance, and it has been incorporated into Wikipedia culture as a recognized value among a large contingent of Wikipedians. The essay you created, and the work you did to defend it, is a testament to how dissent is not disloyalty—and how constructive dissent, like constructive edits, improve Wikipedia.
I hope your burnout was limited to your editing as a Wikipedian. Have a great life. —Nøkkenbuer (talk • contribs) 00:52, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Gorilla skull 2Dmono.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Gorilla skull 2Dmono.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
The article Agoraphobia without history of panic disorder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
It seems redundant to have both an article for agoraphobia and agoraphobia without a history of panic disorder. Agoraphobia does not require panic disorder to be diagnosed but is often associated with it, usually preceding it. This would easily fit within the scope of the agoraphobia
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joeception (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
The file File:ColorPhi.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Broken SVG, available as PNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Projectivism for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Projectivism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.