User talk:AldonsoP

This is AldonsoP's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luzia Simons (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All sources apart from the 1 (DFA) are sourced to the books themselves at Worldcat. The exhibition sources are primary. Requires independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luzia Simons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luzia Simons, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AldonsoP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello AldonsoP. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AldonsoP. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AldonsoP|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --- Possibly ☎ 14:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Possibly. Thanks for your comments. I am new to this. Indeed I have to declare COI, already edited my user page. I am not doing this for pay, but as a curator and personal friend of the artist. Nevertheless I believe she has a relevant enough career to get a wiki entry. --AldonsoP (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AldonsoP: thank you for clarifying that. Yes, I think she qualifies for an article in terms of notability. You will need to make sure everything is sourced. Also, be aware that statements like "Identity as a sociocultural construction" probably aren't a good idea, as this is a general encyclopedia, and it also looks like original research. Make it simple, and all sourced, and it will be fine. --- Possibly ☎ 20:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few edits to the article. It is close to be ready to pass AFC, but it needs two things: the date of birth and education should have a source right next tot he claim. Second, the section that theorizes her work ("Identity as a sociocultural construction has been central... displaced and transformed from its natural origin.") needs to be given in non-artspeak. If you can say the same thing very simply, in less academic language, I think your article will be ready to publish. --- Possibly ☎ 20:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Possibly thank you again for the precious tips. I will look into that. Does it mean that despite the COI I can keep on editing? --AldonsoP (talk) 21:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AldonsoP: yes of course, keep editing the draft. You can edit drafts all you like as long as you disclose your COI. When you are ready, submit it for AFC review. If it is published, do not edit the article (in "article space", visible to the public) directly; instead, ask on the talk page for changes. That is the nutshell WP:COI guideline. We are appreciative of those who approach WP honestly. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 22:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AldonsoP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --- Possibly ☎ 20:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luzia Simons (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ThadeusOfNazereth was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

So since the last review there's been some new sourcing added, which is good, but unfortunately a lot of these sources still don't meet WP:BIO's standards for establishing notability because they're things like storefront pages or short snippets from collections - That means they're not considered independent. A better option for establishing notability would be news coverage - Profiles of the artist published in magazines or well-known blogs, for example. You might also think about looking at WP:ARTIST and clarifying in the article if she meets one of those four standards - Often, as reviewers, we can't judge that unless it's made explicit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luzia Simons and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luzia Simons, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 09:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luzia Simons

Hello, AldonsoP. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luzia Simons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]