User talk:Albert einstein2010

Speedy deletion nomination of Eugen Campu

A tag has been placed on Eugen Campu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Dear Wikipedia al the World is against you.You don‘t have experts in mathematics from the top 10 mathematical centres in the World to comment the work of Eugen Campu and Vasiliu Lucilius.You don‘t have money to pay experts and put robots to make comments.Sincerely al the winners ofFields Medal.Albert einstein2010[reply]

Concerning articles

Also, please note that we do not sign our contributions in the article itself. Phrases like "edited on ... by xyz" are not appropriate. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Dear Wikipedia the quality of yours mathematical article is below any criticism.Tell the trouth to the people.You don‘t have money to pay real mathematical person to make a correct evaluation of a notion.You dissrupt the Internet traffic at such a large scale.You put nonhuman robots that make some crazy evaluation like in the case of professor Eugen Campu from Bucharest,about the name of citations of the name,the location of his working place;the capital of the country,the mathematical degree.The problem is that you don‘t have money to pay good specialists that can give a good evaluation of scientific news.Albert einstein2010.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasiliu lucilius

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vasiliu lucilius, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Jake Wartenberg 22:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Dear Wikipedians you dissrupt the Internet traffic tell to the world that all the mathematical sites of your site are below any criticism.You don’t have money to pay an authorized person to make a real mathematical criticism.And that is the situation even in medicine.Albert einstein2010.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eugen Campu

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Eugen Campu, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ray^Talk 01:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Dear Wikipedians you have a great problem.The quality of your mathematical sites is below any rational criticism.You may improuve very much your style ba adding very good mathematicians in your Wikipedian team.That mans must be recompensated of course.All the Wikipedians that makes speedy deletion must to come with some mans that are authoritys in respective cultural area.In mathematics of course you must to have the signature of the greatest mathematical specialist in the area of the article.[reply]

August 2009

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Jimmy Wales. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rodhull andemu 14:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Eugen Campu

I have nominated Eugen Campu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Campu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ray^Talk 17:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear incult Wikipedians you don‘t have money to make a good disscusion about the site.You mast to take in your team experts from the top 10 mathematical centres of the world. You put robots to make comments.Sincerely all the winners of Fields Medal.Albert einstein2010

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasiliu lucilius

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vasiliu lucilius, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vejvančický (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you add defamatory content once again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. decltype (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

decltype (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]