User talk:Alankritg

April 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Alankritg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can I be unblocked please will follow the guidelines and not use the account for promotion or advertising including writing about my employer

Accept reason:

I've unblocked. Please familiarize yourself with WP:COI and WP:Promo before your resume editing. PhilKnight (talk) 23:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:40, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alankritg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no content in the article which was for promotion or advertising, I had honestly declared that I am an employee of the company adhering to the wikipedia standards, the article had appropriate citations about the company sources such as gigagom etc. which are well known websites

Decline reason:

Editing Wikipedia with promotional intent is also forbidden; creating an article about your employer is promotion regardless of content. I agree there was promotional intent in your draft. MER-C 12:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@MER-C: I was considering accepting this unblock request before you declined it. My reasoning follows: (a) we generally don't block COI editors who are using AFC unless the promotion is blatant, which isn't the case here; (b) the editor was using Draft space and submitting the article for review via AFC, which is the only acceptable venue Wikipedia offers for editors with a conflict of interest; (c) the editor has complied with Wikimedia:Terms of Use by publicly disclosing his conflict of interest; and (d) he cannot bring the draft article up to acceptable standards if he is blocked. If the draft meets inclusion criteria and Wikipedia's editorial policies, then I have no objection to unblocking so that he can improve the draft. Based on my reasoning, would you object to unblocking? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat. It is also standard practice to require a broad interest in improving the encyclopedia and generally avoid writing articles about their employers. I'm seeing neither here. MER-C 05:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: So I shouldn't never write about my employer even in a draft mode was trying to , I am just curious to know as anyways I am been blocked to create new articles in draft mode too.

Thanks @Anachronist: will try to improve Wikipedia if I am un-blocked

Your submission at Articles for creation: MangoApps (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Bluntly, this is still advertising as it has been each time it's been deleted here and in article mainspace, and repeated attempts advertising with the same contents and overall essence (like here) is not helping for our policies. It's clearly too soon given how young the company is, and all that's available is PR (regardless of publication or name).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MangoApps and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:MangoApps

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:MangoApps, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302 you may delete the page as Coffee has blocked me indefinitely and I cannot edit the page, thanks for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.248.77.174 (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]