Jump to content

User talk:Alan16/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 9

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 8 June 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Fantasy novels / authors spam

You have re-added this as a "novel" [[1]], to quote a message on my talk page, please do some research before returning "content"

And after further research 2 of the items that you re-added had been deleted as non-notable in AfDs [2] (this self published author may have been PROD cause I am not finding AfD: [3] see Publishamerica). I will stand by my deletions and WP:PROVEIT requiring the editor wishing to add or return material to provide sourcing. -- The Red Pen of Doom 02:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Per the Pulitzer site [4] they have only announced "finalists" since 1980. I am not seeing any reliable source that would be able to verify a 1977 "finalist". -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Or the echochamber has created an urban myth. WP:BLP: "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." None of the sources that I have seen that support the claim are of the sort that I would identify as more reliable than the Pulitzer site itself which says that "nominees" were not identified. -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
I do agree that even without being a Pulitzer nominee, Monaco or at least his novels have had significant coverage in 3rd party sources meeting our notability requirements and will not object to the inclusion on the 2 list articles we have been discussing. -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 10:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 9
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alan16/Archive_3&oldid=1166515097"