User talk:Alamawi
|
October 2008
[edit]Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Arabized Berber, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. cf38talk 08:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Consistent Vandalism of Arab related pages
[edit]You are showing a pattern of vandalism, please note that this is bieng reported. If you wish to discuss addition of new materials, do so in the Tlk pages. collounsbury (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Algeria, you will be blocked from editing. - Fastily (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Algeria
[edit]Hi Alamawi, I have again reverted your changes to the article Algeria. Please note that while a few of your changes may be constructive, removing entire sections like religion is considered vandalism and can get you blocked from further editing on Wikipedia. Also the version you attempt to revert to is quite old which in turn causes problems. Please don't revert to that version again. If you do want to edit constructively I suggest you make several smaller edits instead, and don't remove entire sections. Also, make sure you use edit summaries to explain your edits! Kind regards, Njaelkies Lea (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Algeria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dougofborg (talk) 12:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Alamawi, you should really be a little more helpful and explain your reasons for bold changes. Please don't just delete sourced material - discuss it on the talkpage, we'll be happy to find a consensus. We all invest quite a lot of time in finding good sources for any figure or statement, we would be glad if you appreciate that. Thanks--Ilyacadiz (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Alamawi, I see that today - Feb. 11th - you engaged in a kind of edit war with Berber-freeman. A little annoying, I think. It would have been a good idea to report Berber-freeman for blocking (at [1] as he has made similar vandalism edits before. Would have been wiser than trying to counter him by putting the opposite views/figures... Best wishes--Ilyacadiz (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)