User talk:Alam4u1

April 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KH-1 (talk) 03:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Freelancer. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. bonadea contributions talk 08:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alam4u1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18487 was submitted on Jun 10, 2017 18:02:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my ID

Hello Team,

I am new to wikipedia contributor, I was updating the Dead Link in wikipedia, but might I have done some mistake in updating the dead link. I will not edited and updated any document in wikipedia, I will read the wikipedia guide line first then I will edited or post.

Please unblock my Id , please don't update my or website native feedback. I assure you I will do do any updating activity in future.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alam4u1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my Id , please don't update my or website native feedback. I assure you I will do do any updating activity in future. Alam4u1 (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock my ID

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alam4u1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the relevant policy pages on Wikipedia and some Wikipedia articles on the subject of adding inappropriate external links, i read the Wikipedia:adding inappropriate external links and the Wikipedia:adding inappropriate external links violations articles several times and understand them completely. Wikipedia is very dear to my heart and now i fully comply with the rules of adding inappropriate external links and the rules of wikipedia and i will only assume good faith……. I admit I should not adding inappropriate external links created all these new accounts, and im begging for forgiveness and closure………if your still sceptical, you can unblock me and have someone monitor my edits, im more than ok with that because i know that im now editing in good faith and adding reliable information with reliable sources…..please open a discussion about unblocking my ID. 1. I understand what you have been blocked for adding inappropriate external links 2. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and 3. I will make useful contributions instead.Alam4u1 (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

procedural decline, only one unblock request at a time please, will review in conjunction with the newer unblock request below. Floquenbeam (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock my ID

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alam4u1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption alter any Links, and I will make useful contributions instead inserting external links Alam4u1 (talk) 22:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Wikipedia is very dear to my heart"? You've only been here a short time, and done nothing except add spamming links to your site. It is not possible anyone could come here in good faith and think that's OK, whether or not you've read our policies. I see no reason to think your presence here will be useful to us. Declining this request and re-blocking with talk page access revoked due to timesink issues. Floquenbeam (talk) 14:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.