User talk:Al Comane

Welcome!

Hi Al Comane! I noticed your contributions to AnimatLab and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Cheers, atque supra! Fake scientist 8000 15:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with AIOS. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my mistake, but that was not a page and just redirect from what I've seen as the page is - wiki/Algerian_Institute_of_Standardization Al Comane (talk) 15:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work on the draft to see if this company is notable enough for inclusion in the first place. If it is accepted, then a disambiguation hatnote may be required at the top.

Do you have any personal or professional affiliation with this company? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310 I was reading the Disambiguation guidelines and wanted to ask if the article published under the Algerian Institute of Standardization, which is redirected from AIOS, does not fall under broad-concept articles. How is this different from the Institute of Standardization in Albania, Austria, Australia, Argentina, Azerbaijan, or any other countries with a similar institution?

A Supreme court, National trust, or Finance minister (or Ministry of Finance) is each a kind of entity occurring in multiple countries and possibly in other political entities and serving the same purpose in each. Rather than having disambiguation pages at these titles linking to existing articles on these entities by nation, each should contain an article describing in general terms what the concept is and how the different examples of this concept relate to each other.

Al Comane (talk) 01:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AIOS

Hello, Al Comane. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AIOS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AIOS

Hello, Al Comane. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "AIOS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AIOS (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AIOS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Al Comane! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello Al Comane. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:AIOS, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Al Comane. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Al Comane|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]