User talk:Al0001

==MESSAGE TO ALL "WEB-FRIENDS" CONSIDERING THEMSELVES WIKIPEDIA POLICE OFFICERS WHO SHOUL ARREST EVERYBODY EVEN BEFORE TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON==
!!!NO DELETION PLEASE!!! THIS IS NOT A COPYRIHT INFRINGEMENT!!! The few similar informaion showed at "shuppartists.com" couln't be a reason to delete the whole page!!!
This is the official biography of two distinguished artists and there is nothing illegal to look similar - NOT EQUAL - to other sites, where these artists are exposed.

What's up dude? You stop copying stuff from that website and they'll probably stop deleting it. Copyrights are taken very seriously here, and if you keep on creating that page with copyrighted text they'll probably lock it. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 13:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT IS GOING WRONG WITH YOU, frineds??? Don't you understand that there will be ALWAYS some word or sentence in the informaion about a worldknown artist appearing "copied" somewhere because the artist is worldknown and te sources are millions and millions? I am not copying the infmation from "shuppartists.com" because it is my and my partner's official biography. I AM NOT ALLOWED to use another one, only to vary it. Is this clear now??? Don't forget that not everybody is "guilty until proving his innocence"!!! It is in opposite!!! SO PLEASE STOP IMMEDIATELY DELETING MY PAGE. al0001

Please write in your own sentences, own words and don't just "vary" something from a website. Yes you are allowed to write on your own. I think it has been made very clear that copyvios will not be tolerated and deleted immediately. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you have also admitted that you are one of the artists concerned, so you have a significant Conflict of interest. Please don't use wikipedia to advertise. If you think you are notable, do consider requesting that you have an article: then someone independent can decide whether it's justified and how a neutral article can be written. TrulyBlue (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not making avertisement of myself - THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE who are asking mem why the Duo isstill not presented at Wikipedia. Do you understand the slight difference? Your idea might be good, but having in mind your way of "understanding" as well as the way of understanding of the other so called "administrators" trying to put the whole world in rigid and fossilized rules, without understanding that people are SO DIFFERENT and their lifes are such also, I don't think that there would come something very meaningful from your idea. Wikipedia is just becoing ore and more an DICTATURE of the aggressive primiivism. al0001

Well, you seem to be trying to describe Genova & Dimitrov according to "rigid and fossilized rules" - you seem only able to copy what has been written before. Why are you "not allowed" to write another description? Why can't someone else write something different for you? Lots of people have spent time trying to talk to you about how wikipedia works and what you should do to get an article. You continued to ignore that advice, repeatedly broke wikipedia's rules, and have now been banned (twice). That's a shame, as I think you might actually deserve a wikipedia article, and your behaviour may prevent that from happening for a while. One last piece of advice: hang around wikipedia, look at how it works, and what the rules are, think about your article and when you're ready, ask to be unbanned, describing exactly what you intend to do. Without some evidence that you understand wikipedia, I suspect that you will not be able to edit. Regards, TrulyBlue (talk) 11:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Genova & Dimitrov

A tag has been placed on Genova & Dimitrov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is an exact, or almost exact copy of http://www.shuppartists.com/Shupp/Artists/Genova%20and%20Dimitrov.htm

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 13:18, 27 December 2008 (UTC) hangon[reply]

December 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Genova & Dimitrov. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --Habbouser (talk) 13:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Genova_&_Dimitrov, you will be blocked from editing. TrulyBlue (talk) 13:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read all the relevant policies about copyright (you have been given links many times) and create a page that does not infringe copyright. Thank you. TrulyBlue (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Liuben for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. BradV 19:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Smashville^talk 20:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]