User talk:Akbar amer yunus

October 2020

Hello Akbar amer yunus. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akbar amer yunus. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akbar amer yunus|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 15:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:AliRasoulLTD per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AliRasoulLTD. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked following the investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AliRasoulLTD. Because you were previously blocked while using the account AliRasoulLTD, your creation and use of this account is block evasion. Therefore, you have been blocked. If you don't have access to the account AliRasoulLTD anymore, you may appeal your block here. If you do have access, then you should appeal your block at User talk:AliRasoulLTD using that account.

If you are not the person which controlled/controls the account AliRasoulLTD, you may appeal this block here. Regardless, if you decide to request an unblock you will need to address the sockpuppetry issues and also whether you are paid for your edits to the now deleted article Ali Rasoul you created. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]